Re: [CANSLIM] CVH

From: "david frank" <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:16:47 -0500
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Best CNBC Commentators "Patrick Wahl"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
Bill, the high this morning is 34.90. so looks like a moot point. david
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH


> One more point of interest to me about CVH is the pivot point in relation
to
> the high of 34.20 back on 6/18. I realize that coming out of a bear (if we
> indeed are) the pivot point may be lower than the 52 week high. Still,
that
> seems to me it would make a very possible point of resistance.
> Am I just splitting hairs here?
>
> -Bill
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just to close the loop on yesterday's CVH discussion---see today's
weblink
> > on CVH:
> >
> > www.investors.com/weblink
> >
> >
> > Katherine
> >
> > | :
> > | : Jack
> > | : --- Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > | : > reading all the emails tonight on this topic, I had
> > | : > assumed this "spike"
> > | : > came at the open. I was quite surprised when I
> > | : > finally got around to looking
> > | : > at a one minute chart of today's trade, and saw it
> > | : > happened late morning. I
> > | : > must agree, from my experience it is highly
> > | : > suspicious of manipulation.
> > | : >
> > | : > ----- Original Message -----
> > | : > From: "david frank" <camelot.homes@charter.net>
> > | : > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > | : > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:29 PM
> > | : > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CVH
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : > I got caught in this so-called CVH inbalanced.
> > | : > luckily i had a limit order
> > | : > in place. although limit orders don't work
> > | : > sometimes- because they don't
> > | : > have to execute limit orders, although they are
> > | : > within the price window. of
> > | : > course. there were too many eyes on CVH. i was
> > | : > curious what kind of remedy
> > | : > is there for this specialist's malfeasance,
> > | : > especially for buyers @ 34.50
> > | : > and above- more than 10 minutes after placing their
> > | : > market orders. david
> > | : > ----- Original Message -----
> > | : > From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" <ed@macktracks.com>
> > | : > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > | : > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:36 AM
> > | : > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CVH
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : > > One of the risks with CANSLIM -  too many
> > | : > investors ready to pounce on
> > | : > > too few stocks.  We have been stalking CVH for
> > | : > quite a while.  We put in
> > | : > > an order prior to it reaching its pivot (cheating)
> > | : > when NYSE on level
> > | : > > two showed $32.40 offer.  As CANSLIMR's moved in
> > | : > to buy - the specialist
> > | : > > did not open the book until $34.50.  The
> > | : > specialist claimed "order
> > | : > > imbalance" but my source at Pershing said he was
> > | : > working another book.
> > | : > > We were quite upset  The stock moved over $2.00 on
> > | : > an imbalance of
> > | : > > 110,000 shs.  The market maker was caught
> > | : > flatfooted.  We quickly sold
> > | : > > out of our position because we were over the 5%
> > | : > threshold.
> > | : > >
> > | : > > Those trading Island or other ECN's may have been
> > | : > filled around
> > | : > > 32.40-32.50.  We watch Time and Sales on all our
> > | : > fills and the only
> > | : > > prints were coming from ECN's.  With CANSLIM being
> > | : > one of the most
> > | : > > popular strategies for individual investors,
> > | : > execution is becoming more
> > | : > > and more difficult.
> > | : > >
> > | : > > Ed Gjertsen II
> > | : > > ed@macktracks.com
> > | : > >
> > | : > >
> > | : > > -
> > | : > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> > | : > "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | : > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | : > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
> > | : > email.
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : > -
> > | : > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> > | : > "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | : > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | : > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
> > | : > email.
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : >
> > | : > -
> > | : > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> > | : > "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | : > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | : > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
> > | : email.
> > | :
> > | :
> > | : =====
> > | : Jack
> > | :
> > | : __________________________________________________
> > | : Do You Yahoo!?
> > | : HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs
> > | : http://www.hotjobs.com
> > | :
> > | : -
> > | : -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | : -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | : -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > |
> > |
> > | -
> > | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > | -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.