From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:43:53 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] for DGO Users (was Fw: Conseco [T20020813002H]) Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi jans, Here I was trying to distinguish between a "stock on the rise" that rises >=25% then forms a valid base between each rise (where counting the bases comes in) and a *type* of base referred to as the ascending base. So, no, was not saying anything different than what WON says on base count. There's quite a few follow-on emails to this one with some links included.... that should clear it up. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: <Spencer48@aol.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 8:28 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO | Katherine: | | If this is true, than aren't you compromising WON's dictum that a 3rd, | 4th or 5th stage of a stock's base is in the danger zone. Or, in your | experience, do ascending bases have not so many bases as to reach the 3rd, | 4th or 5th base-danger zone? | | jans | | | In a message dated 8/12/2002 9:53:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, | kmalm@earthlink.net writes: | | << There's actually no such thing, as "ascending base" is a very particular | kind of conolidation in the stock's move. In general, a stock will rise, then | pause (base), rise, then pause, rise, then pause, and so on. As long as the | rise between consolidations is at least 25%, the next area of consolidation | is considered a new stage base.... >> | | - | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] for DGO Users (was Fw: Conseco [T20020813002H]) Spencer48@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] XRAY and CECO Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]