From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:49:17 -0600
Next Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Volatility (was [CANSLIM] CSTR) "Norman"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Norman"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Maybe that the handle formed part way up the right side of the cup was a warning sign? I'm assuming you would have bought a breakout at that level. When this was originally mentioned here, I looked at it and thought it was such an odd little niche business that it probably had limited growth potential. (doesn't mean it could not have moved on up a bit) On 27 Aug 2002 at 10:22, michael_niemotka@baxter.com wrote: > their famous 20-20 hindsight to show why it was destined to fall. Does > anyone else see anything in the price volume action that would lead them to > believe that this was going to happen, or is it the M that is still not > strong enough? - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: Volatility (was [CANSLIM] CSTR) "Norman"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Norman"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]