Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR

From: "Winston Little" <wlittle1@peoplepc.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:18:59 -0400
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Norman"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Norman"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR "Cefaloni, John L Jr. [AMSTA-AR-WEA]"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
My recollection is that Roger Tawa pointed out that "SHIFT happens" not
"S--T".

The CSTR COO is targeted to be on CNBC Squawk Box at 07:30 am Thu. 29
Aug.2002.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR


> I was afraid of that, more work on our part to learn what the analysts are
> going to announce, before they announce it:-(
> Thanks for the view point, Tom.
>
> Here ya go Katherine, another entry for the group FAQ:  "s _ _ t happens"
>
> Norm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
>
>
> > the lesson to learn from CSTR is that s _ _ t happens, and sometimes you
> > simply cannot see it coming, or avoid it. On the other hand, if the
rumor
> of
> > a report alleging "saturation" is correct, then your own due diligence
> might
> > have drawn you to the same conclusion, and kept you out of the stock. As
> > Katherine pointed out, SBUX has had to deal with this issue, so far
> > successfully. Others have pointed out KKD as a saturation candidate,
> hasn't
> > stopped it going up either over the past year.
> >
> > On the other hand, both SBUX and KKD now have charts that most
CANSLIMers
> > would avoid, with SBUX forming a handle in the lower half of the cup,
and
> > KKD in a downtrend. Maybe saturation is finally a concern that the
market
> is
> > starting to believe, or has finally become real. Compared to this,
CSTR's
> > chart looks pretty good. For me, their business simply never made sense,
> > that's why I had no interest in it. I put my quarters in the piggy bank,
> and
> > roll them myself when its full. I use my pennies, nickels and dimes when
I
> > buy something in order to get more quarters back, or only get paper
bills.
> > So I never accumulate large amounts of coins, and have a limited amount
of
> > coins jingling in my pocket each day (and yes, I will stoop over and
pick
> up
> > those pennies that others throw away, it may save me having to get more
on
> a
> > future purchase).
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:32 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> >
> >
> > I agree Tom, too much unknown about what their agenda is.  However, in
the
> > case of CSTR, the chart is too late to help a poor CAN SLIMer.  I have
> been
> > in and out of EASI in the past (pre-9/11) and found that a particular
> > analyst kept killing rallies after short gains; no good reason other
than
> he
> > thought it was "overvalued".  It almost seems that we need to know the
> > analysts who are covering our holdings, know their history regarding
those
> > holdings, and read their reports, hopefully before everyone else does.
I
> > dunno, seems like a catch 22.
> >
> > Norm
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 6:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> >
> >
> > > one of the problems I have with analysts is that they don't put all
> their
> > > cards on the table where we can see them. You don't know what their
> > "hidden
> > > agenda" is, or where their interests lie.  Certainly recent legal
action
> > has
> > > shown us that they can tout stocks to the public, while trashing them
> > within
> > > their own organization. And we have also seen that they can continue
to
> > > recommend stocks like Enron all the way into bankruptcy.
> > >
> > > Yes, they very definitely can have an impact if they have a following,
> or
> > > work for a brokerage house with a sufficiently sized retail force.
> Nothing
> > > wrong in listening to an analyst (if you don't mind your mind and
> thinking
> > > process being potentially polluted and corrupted), but take what they
> say
> > > and apply simply common sense and logic to it. Ultimately, let the
chart
> > and
> > > the fundamentals steer your decision making however, not what some
> analyst
> > > is saying. Far too often what they say today only lasts today, by
> tomorrow
> > > they may say something totally contradictory.
> > >
> > > The charts are fact, an analyst's report is an opinion.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Norman" <theboyd@tisd.net>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 7:16 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill et al,
> > >
> > > RE the comments on a sell off of CSTR due to a "sell report".  How
come
> > > 'everyone else' is apparently listening to analysts while us CAN
SLIMers
> > are
> > > supposed to ignore them as irrelevant?  This has always puzzled me.
Or,
> > can
> > > this "Off Wall Street" be considered one of the analysts to be
ignored;
> or
> > > are they some other kind of M animal?  Sure seems like analysts have
an
> > > impact, time and again, even though WON says to disregard their
advice.
> > >
> > > Norm
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Bill Triffet" <btriffet@earthlink.net>
> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:29 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> > >
> > >
> > > > Just to add - IBD mentioned tonight, A sell report from Off Wall
> Street
> > > > Consulting Group caused the selloff.
> > > >
> > > > Taken from another site: "Off Wall Street, based in Cambridge,
> > > > Massachusetts, declined to confirm it had issued a report and said
its
> > > > research is provided only to clients who pay for the service."
> > > >
> > > > That explains the lack of news during the day.
> > > >
> > > > -Bill
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 7:16 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > I think the handle is fine, well into the upper half of the cup.
> > Volume
> > > > > declined ok, b/o on 8/15 on more than 3X ADV.
> > > > >
> > > > > Where I would fault it is on revenues, which over the past 4
> quarters
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > > show me the kind of consistent growth to justify either the growth
> in
> > > > > earnings, or the high PE, although if you believe the projected
> > earnings
> > > > (I
> > > > > don't) then the projected PE is more moderate.
> > > > >
> > > > > I see this as a business that will best thrive when the economy
> > falters
> > > to
> > > > > the point that everyone is taking their jars of pocket change, and
> > > having
> > > > it
> > > > > counted, because they need a little "nest egg".
> > > > >
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
> > > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:49 AM
> > > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CSTR
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Maybe that the handle formed part way up the right side of the cup
> was
> > a
> > > > > warning
> > > > > sign?  I'm assuming you would have bought a breakout at that
level.
> > > When
> > > > > this was
> > > > > originally mentioned here, I looked at it and thought it was such
an
> > odd
> > > > > little niche
> > > > > business that it probably had limited growth potential.  (doesn't
> mean
> > > it
> > > > > could not
> > > > > have moved on up a bit)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 27 Aug 2002 at 10:22, michael_niemotka@baxter.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > their famous 20-20 hindsight to show why it was destined to
fall.
> > > Does
> > > > > > anyone else see anything in the price volume action that would
> lead
> > > them
> > > > > to
> > > > > > believe that this was going to happen, or is it the M that is
> still
> > > not
> > > > > > strong enough?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -
> > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -
> > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> > -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
> >
> >
>
>
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
>


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.