From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] PRS
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 14:56:36 -1000
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro: David Keller "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This stock showed up on my lists today having formed a 5 day handle after a dramatic 30% price gain on 8/21. My Canslim Evaluator turned up some surprizing fundamentals such as 151% compound EPS growth over 3 years but an EPS of -65% for the most recent quarter. Institutional ownership is supposedly only 25%. Does anyone have an explanation for the strange EPS nos. and recent price hike? Aloha, Mike Gibbons Proactive Technologies, LLC http://www.proactech.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Norman Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:34 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts Mike, Fair question. And I apologize (to all) for going so far "out in the woods." It's a soap box I carry with me every where I go<G> Norm - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 5:28 PM Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > My point was simply to say that there is a plausible explanation for the > occurance of fibonnaci numbers all around us in nature, and to ask the > question: Is there a plausible explanation for the occurance of fibonacci > series in stock market waves? > > Aloha, > > Mike Gibbons > Proactive Technologies, LLC > http://www.proactech.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Norman > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:17 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > I agree David, Mike, that mathematicians and statisticians can find all > sorts of "correlations" in nature. And, I am also fascinated by these > little "Easter eggs", to use a programmers phrase for "hidden goodies". But > correlation, by definition, does not infer a cause & effect relationship. > And, I know first hand that if these little circumstances are not > scrutinized VERY carefully and OBJECTIVELY, then even very intelligent folks > can come the wrong conclusion. Plus, there are other variables that can > affect species in nature besides inheritance. With that, I think I may have > come to end of my own intelligence on the matter (did I hear applause<G>), > and we are waaaayyyyy OT now. Thanks for y'alls (yep, I'm from TX) input. > > Norm > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Taggart" <dctag@mavericktrading.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:58 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > Norm, > > > > Fibonacci ratios are found throughout nature. > > http://www.brooksdesign-ps.com/Code/Html/godna2.htm also check out The > > Elliot Wave Theory by Frost it talks a lot about Fib ratios. That being > > said I dont use them much. > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > Original Message----- > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Norman > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:14 PM > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > Hi Maui Mike, > > > > OK, on topic and out of the shadows<G> The investors.com chart shows a > low > > of 911.06. I know that sometimes there are trades that confound the > > charting sites, so where can I get the same info you have? > > > > As for encoding Fib lines in DNA; that's a little far fetched even for > this > > Trekker to consider<G> My ecology understanding dictates that genes > survive > > by increasing the reproductive success of the species. Now I can think > > "outside of the box" as good as the next scientist, but this one doesn't > > seem to be in the same room with the box<g> Looks like an observation has > > been made, now you have postulated a theory, who's gonna test it<G> > > > > Elliot wave theory is 'nother story and one that I don't have enuf > knowledge > > to address at this time. > > > > There, now *that's* OT! > > > > Norm > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com> > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:01 PM > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > Norm and kelly, > > > > > > I don't want to be picky, but the S&P 500 sank to below 905 at about > > 10:00. > > > It then rose and fell again with a turn later in the day at 911. So the > > turn > > > was actually lower than Ernie predicted. > > > > > > That said, I do agree that Ernie's forecasts since I've been following > > them > > > have certainly been on the money and within what I would consider > > > "experimental error". > > > > > > However, I have the same kind of feeling about Elliot Wave Theory as > > > Einstein had about the uncertainty principal - without a rational > > > explanation for why it works (if it does reliably), its hard to believe > in > > > it. > > > > > > I can understand fibonacci numbers recurring frequently in nature > because > > > they could be somehow encoded in DNA, but I have a hard time seeing how > > they > > > could apply to the stock market. But then again, I haven't put any time > > into > > > trying to understand the causal connection and my comments are based > > largely > > > on ignorance. If any member of the group can explain a possible causal > > > relationship, I would find that helpful. > > > > > > Also, why is this off topic? Understanding M is fundamental to CANSLIM > > > because 75% of stocks go with the flow. > > > > > > Aloha, > > > > > > Mike Gibbons > > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Kelly Short > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:36 AM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > Norm, > > > > > > I was commenting at lunch at perfectly he called it today and yesterday. > > > Almost to the hour. I wonder if he tracks the success of his > predictions. > > > > > > Kelly > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Norman [mailto:theboyd@tisd.net] > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:27 PM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I know it's a little (OK a lot<G>) off topic, but is interesting. For > > those > > > of you who subscribed to Ernie's S&P 500 forecasts, did you notice he > has > > > apparently called this one perfectly. He predicted a turn window or > > > 910-913. Today it turned at 911.06. For now, his crystal ball is > > working. > > > For those of you who are not subscribed I copied last nights forecast > > below. > > > > > > Norm > > > > > > > > > Once again today could be the bottom, as we came within a whisker of the > > > 910-913 target range, and both of my short term cycle indicators are > > > suggesting that a turn is imminent. While the next target level of > 876-884 > > > is still a possibility, at this point I would have to say that it is not > > > very likely that we will go that low. > > > > > > > > > > > > The 910-913 range has emerged as the high probability target for the > > > termination of this short term down move. The most likely scenario for > > > tomorrow would be a move slightly lower into the target range or just > > below > > > before the market terminates the move, and begins to go higher. The > second > > > most likely scenario is that the market will open higher and continue to > > > move higher from there. And the third most likely scenario would be a > > > continuation of the down move possibly as low as 900, with an intra-day > > > reversal featuring a closing price above at least 911. Each of these > > > scenarios involves the 910-913 target range. > > > > > > > > > > > > Despite the high probability that we are about to make a turn and not > > likely > > > to go much lower, until we see the turn confirmation signal this market > > > could still reach the lower target range > > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > > > For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for viruses. > > > Visit us at http://www.neoris.com/ > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > - > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro: David Keller "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PRS Spencer48@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]