Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: Gene Ricci <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] HGSI
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:51:40 -0500
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_05C7_01C25013.38EAAE20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hgsinvestor/ Dave, what does BloombergLP stand for? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DAVID KELLER, BLOOMBERG/ 499 PARK=20 To: canslim@LISTS.XMISSION.COM=20 Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 10:34 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts Sorry!! Can someone tell me how to access the HGSI forum? I'd definitely be = interested=20 in partcipating. Thanks- Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: Norman <canslim@lists.xmission.com> At: 8/30 9:32 > All, >=20 > We DON'T really want to get into a rigorous examination of these = phenomena, > on a case by case basis, and whither or not there is any cause & = effect > relationship that can be assigned to them. Not here! >=20 > I think this is the reason there was at one time a TA group formed = from this > group. Maybe the folks in the HGSI forum would accommodate this = discussion > as they seem to delve into TA a bit more than this group. >=20 > Norm > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "DAVID KELLER, BLOOMBERG/ 499 PARK" <DKELLER2@bloomberg.net> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 7:08 AM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts >=20 >=20 > > even more examples of Fibonacci: bottom of a pine cone (each = direction is > a > > Fibonacci number), architecture (Parthenon's columns use Fibonacci > proportions), > > or my personal favorite: music (Beethoven's 5th, Dvorak, etc)... > > > > Regarding why it works in the financial markets, check out the S&P = from > > 5/01-12/01. 61.8% almost to the dollar. Think anyone on the = street was > > watching that?... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Mike Gibbons <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > At: 8/29 18:06 > > > > > Hi Norm, > > > > > > My information came from quotetracker as follows: > > > > > > > > > > > > As for my hypothesis about DNA and fibonacci numbers: DNA = transmits the > code > > by > > > which every organsim develops. So the "shape" of a > > > plant for example is determined by its DNA. I recall (although = its been > a long > > > time ) that fibonacci numbers are found, for example, > > > in the number of leaves on a fern frond. In other words, that = fibonacci > > pattern > > > must have been encoded in the DNA in some way. > > > Presumanbly, also, ferns with that DNA pattern were "fitter" for > survival than > > > ferns that didn't have fibonacci numbers encoded in > > > their DNA. Now we are definitely off topic, but I enjoy a little > intellectual > > > diversion sometimes. > > > > > > Aloha, > > > > > > Mike Gibbons > > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Norman > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:14 AM > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > Hi Maui Mike, > > > > > > OK, on topic and out of the shadows<G> The investors.com chart = shows a > low > > > of 911.06. I know that sometimes there are trades that confound = the > > > charting sites, so where can I get the same info you have? > > > > > > As for encoding Fib lines in DNA; that's a little far fetched = even for > this > > > Trekker to consider<G> My ecology understanding dictates that = genes > survive > > > by increasing the reproductive success of the species. Now I = can think > > > "outside of the box" as good as the next scientist, but this one = doesn't > > > seem to be in the same room with the box<g> Looks like an = observation > has > > > been made, now you have postulated a theory, who's gonna test = it<G> > > > > > > Elliot wave theory is 'nother story and one that I don't have = enuf > knowledge > > > to address at this time. > > > > > > There, now *that's* OT! > > > > > > Norm > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com> > > > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:01 PM > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > > Norm and kelly, > > > > > > > > I don't want to be picky, but the S&P 500 sank to below 905 at = about > > > 10:00. > > > > It then rose and fell again with a turn later in the day at = 911. So > the > > > turn > > > > was actually lower than Ernie predicted. > > > > > > > > That said, I do agree that Ernie's forecasts since I've been = following > > > them > > > > have certainly been on the money and within what I would = consider > > > > "experimental error". > > > > > > > > However, I have the same kind of feeling about Elliot Wave = Theory as > > > > Einstein had about the uncertainty principal - without a = rational > > > > explanation for why it works (if it does reliably), its hard = to > believe in > > > > it. > > > > > > > > I can understand fibonacci numbers recurring frequently in = nature > because > > > > they could be somehow encoded in DNA, but I have a hard time = seeing > how > > > they > > > > could apply to the stock market. But then again, I haven't put = any > time > > > into > > > > trying to understand the causal connection and my comments are = based > > > largely > > > > on ignorance. If any member of the group can explain a = possible causal > > > > relationship, I would find that helpful. > > > > > > > > Also, why is this off topic? Understanding M is fundamental to = CANSLIM > > > > because 75% of stocks go with the flow. > > > > > > > > Aloha, > > > > > > > > Mike Gibbons > > > > Proactive Technologies, LLC > > > > http://www.proactech.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Kelly = Short > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:36 AM > > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > > > > Norm, > > > > > > > > I was commenting at lunch at perfectly he called it today and > yesterday. > > > > Almost to the hour. I wonder if he tracks the success of his > predictions. > > > > > > > > Kelly > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Norman [mailto:theboyd@tisd.net] > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:27 PM > > > > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts > > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > I know it's a little (OK a lot<G>) off topic, but is = interesting. For > > > those > > > > of you who subscribed to Ernie's S&P 500 forecasts, did you = notice he > has > > > > apparently called this one perfectly. He predicted a turn = window or > > > > 910-913. Today it turned at 911.06. For now, his crystal = ball is > > > working. > > > > For those of you who are not subscribed I copied last nights = forecast > > > below. > > > > > > > > Norm > > > > > > > > > > > > Once again today could be the bottom, as we came within a = whisker of > the > > > > 910-913 target range, and both of my short term cycle = indicators are > > > > suggesting that a turn is imminent. While the next target = level of > 876-884 > > > > is still a possibility, at this point I would have to say that = it is > not > > > > very likely that we will go that low. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 910-913 range has emerged as the high probability target = for the > > > > termination of this short term down move. The most likely = scenario for > > > > tomorrow would be a move slightly lower into the target range = or just > > > below > > > > before the market terminates the move, and begins to go = higher. The > second > > > > most likely scenario is that the market will open higher and = continue > to > > > > move higher from there. And the third most likely scenario = would be a > > > > continuation of the down move possibly as low as 900, with an > intra-day > > > > reversal featuring a closing price above at least 911. Each of = these > > > > scenarios involves the 910-913 target range. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Despite the high probability that we are about to make a turn = and not > > > likely > > > > to go much lower, until we see the turn confirmation signal = this > market > > > > could still reach the lower target range > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > = _________________________________________________________________________= ___ > > > > For your protection, this e-mail message has been scanned for = viruses. > > > > Visit us at http://www.neoris.com/ > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > > > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. > > > > > > >=20 >=20 > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_05C7_01C25013.38EAAE20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><A=20 href=3D"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/hgsinvestor/">http://groups.yahoo.c= om/group/hgsinvestor/</A></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Dave, what does BloombergLP stand=20 for?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3DDKELLER2@bloomberg.net = href=3D"mailto:DKELLER2@bloomberg.net">DAVID=20 KELLER, BLOOMBERG/ 499 PARK</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@LISTS.XMISSION.COM=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@LISTS.XMISSION.COM">canslim@LISTS.XMISSION.COM</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, August 30, 2002 = 10:34=20 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's=20 Forecasts</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>Sorry!!<BR><BR>Can someone tell me how to access the = HGSI=20 forum? I'd definitely be interested <BR>in partcipating. = Thanks-=20 Dave<BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message -----<BR>From: Norman = <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>At: =20 8/30 9:32<BR><BR>> All,<BR>> <BR>> We DON'T really want = to get=20 into a rigorous examination of these phenomena,<BR>> on a case by = case=20 basis, and whither or not there is any cause & effect<BR>> = relationship=20 that can be assigned to them. Not here!<BR>> <BR>> I think = this is=20 the reason there was at one time a TA group formed from this<BR>>=20 group. Maybe the folks in the HGSI forum would accommodate this=20 discussion<BR>> as they seem to delve into TA a bit more than this=20 group.<BR>> <BR>> Norm<BR>> ----- Original Message = - -----<BR>>=20 From: "DAVID KELLER, BLOOMBERG/ 499 PARK" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:DKELLER2@bloomberg.net">DKELLER2@bloomberg.net</A>><BR>= >=20 To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 7:08 AM<BR>> Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] = Ernie's=20 Forecasts<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> > even more examples of = Fibonacci:=20 bottom of a pine cone (each direction is<BR>> a<BR>> > = Fibonacci=20 number), architecture (Parthenon's columns use Fibonacci<BR>>=20 proportions),<BR>> > or my personal favorite: music = (Beethoven's=20 5th, Dvorak, etc)...<BR>> ><BR>> > Regarding why it works = in the=20 financial markets, check out the S&P from<BR>> > = 5/01-12/01. =20 61.8% almost to the dollar. Think anyone on the street = was<BR>> >=20 watching that?...<BR>> ><BR>> > ----- Original Message=20 -----<BR>> > From: Mike Gibbons <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 > At: 8/29 18:06<BR>> ><BR>> > > Hi = Norm,<BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > My information came from quotetracker as=20 follows:<BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> > ><BR>> = >=20 > As for my hypothesis about DNA and fibonacci numbers: DNA = transmits=20 the<BR>> code<BR>> > by<BR>> > > which every = organsim=20 develops. So the "shape" of a<BR>> > > plant for example is=20 determined by its DNA. I recall (although its been<BR>> a = long<BR>> >=20 > time ) that fibonacci numbers are found, for example,<BR>> = > >=20 in the number of leaves on a fern frond. In other words, that=20 fibonacci<BR>> > pattern<BR>> > > must have been = encoded in the=20 DNA in some way.<BR>> > > Presumanbly, also, ferns with that = DNA=20 pattern were "fitter" for<BR>> survival than<BR>> > > = ferns that=20 didn't have fibonacci numbers encoded in<BR>> > > their DNA. = Now we=20 are definitely off topic, but I enjoy a little<BR>> = intellectual<BR>>=20 > > diversion sometimes.<BR>> > ><BR>> > >=20 Aloha,<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Mike Gibbons<BR>> > = >=20 Proactive Technologies, LLC<BR>> > > <A=20 href=3D"http://www.proactech.com">http://www.proactech.com</A><BR>> = >=20 ><BR>> > ><BR>> > > -----Original = Message-----<BR>>=20 > > From: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com</A><BR>>=20 > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = Norman<BR>>=20 > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:14 AM<BR>> > > = To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts<BR>> > = ><BR>>=20 > ><BR>> > > Hi Maui Mike,<BR>> > ><BR>> = > >=20 OK, on topic and out of the shadows<G> The investors.com = chart=20 shows a<BR>> low<BR>> > > of 911.06. I know that = sometimes=20 there are trades that confound the<BR>> > > charting sites, = so where=20 can I get the same info you have?<BR>> > ><BR>> > > = As for=20 encoding Fib lines in DNA; that's a little far fetched even = for<BR>>=20 this<BR>> > > Trekker to consider<G> My ecology=20 understanding dictates that genes<BR>> survive<BR>> > > by = increasing the reproductive success of the species. Now I can=20 think<BR>> > > "outside of the box" as good as the next = scientist,=20 but this one doesn't<BR>> > > seem to be in the same room = with the=20 box<g> Looks like an observation<BR>> has<BR>> > = >=20 been made, now you have postulated a theory, who's gonna test=20 it<G><BR>> > ><BR>> > > Elliot wave theory is = 'nother=20 story and one that I don't have enuf<BR>> knowledge<BR>> > = > to=20 address at this time.<BR>> > ><BR>> > > There, now = *that's*=20 OT!<BR>> > ><BR>> > > Norm<BR>> > > ----- = Original=20 Message -----<BR>> > > From: "Mike Gibbons" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:mikegibbons@proactech.com">mikegibbons@proactech.com</A>&g= t;<BR>>=20 > > To: <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= ><BR>>=20 > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:01 PM<BR>> > > = Subject:=20 RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts<BR>> > ><BR>> > = ><BR>>=20 > > > Norm and kelly,<BR>> > > ><BR>> > = > > I=20 don't want to be picky, but the S&P 500 sank to below 905 at = about<BR>>=20 > > 10:00.<BR>> > > > It then rose and fell again = with a=20 turn later in the day at 911. So<BR>> the<BR>> > > = turn<BR>>=20 > > > was actually lower than Ernie predicted.<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > > That said, I do agree that Ernie's = forecasts since=20 I've been following<BR>> > > them<BR>> > > > have = certainly been on the money and within what I would consider<BR>> = > >=20 > "experimental error".<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > = >=20 However, I have the same kind of feeling about Elliot Wave Theory = as<BR>>=20 > > > Einstein had about the uncertainty principal - without = a=20 rational<BR>> > > > explanation for why it works (if it = does=20 reliably), its hard to<BR>> believe in<BR>> > > > = it.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > > I can understand fibonacci = numbers=20 recurring frequently in nature<BR>> because<BR>> > > > = they=20 could be somehow encoded in DNA, but I have a hard time seeing<BR>> = how<BR>> > > they<BR>> > > > could apply to the = stock=20 market. But then again, I haven't put any<BR>> time<BR>> > = >=20 into<BR>> > > > trying to understand the causal connection = and my=20 comments are based<BR>> > > largely<BR>> > > > on = ignorance. If any member of the group can explain a possible = causal<BR>>=20 > > > relationship, I would find that helpful.<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > > Also, why is this off topic? Understanding = M is=20 fundamental to CANSLIM<BR>> > > > because 75% of stocks go = with=20 the flow.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > Aloha,<BR>> = >=20 > ><BR>> > > > Mike Gibbons<BR>> > > > = Proactive=20 Technologies, LLC<BR>> > > > <A=20 href=3D"http://www.proactech.com">http://www.proactech.com</A><BR>> = > >=20 ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > -----Original=20 Message-----<BR>> > > > From: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner-canslim@lists.xmis= sion.com</A><BR>>=20 > > > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of = Kelly=20 Short<BR>> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:36 = AM<BR>>=20 > > > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > Norm,<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > > I was commenting at lunch at perfectly he = called=20 it today and<BR>> yesterday.<BR>> > > > Almost to the = hour. I=20 wonder if he tracks the success of his<BR>> predictions.<BR>> = > >=20 ><BR>> > > > Kelly<BR>> > > ><BR>> > = >=20 > -----Original Message-----<BR>> > > > From: Norman=20 [mailto:theboyd@tisd.net]<BR>> > > > Sent: Thursday, = August 29,=20 2002 3:27 PM<BR>> > > > To: <A=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= <BR>>=20 > > > Subject: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts<BR>> > >=20 ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > All,<BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > > I know it's a little (OK a lot<G>) = off=20 topic, but is interesting. For<BR>> > > those<BR>> = > >=20 > of you who subscribed to Ernie's S&P 500 forecasts, did you = notice=20 he<BR>> has<BR>> > > > apparently called this one=20 perfectly. He predicted a turn window or<BR>> > > >=20 910-913. Today it turned at 911.06. For now, his crystal = ball=20 is<BR>> > > working.<BR>> > > > For those of you = who are=20 not subscribed I copied last nights forecast<BR>> > > = below.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > > Norm<BR>> > > = ><BR>> >=20 > ><BR>> > > > Once again today could be the bottom, = as we=20 came within a whisker of<BR>> the<BR>> > > > 910-913 = target=20 range, and both of my short term cycle indicators are<BR>> > = > >=20 suggesting that a turn is imminent. While the next target level = of<BR>>=20 876-884<BR>> > > > is still a possibility, at this point I = would=20 have to say that it is<BR>> not<BR>> > > > very likely = that we=20 will go that low.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > > = ><BR>> >=20 > ><BR>> > > > The 910-913 range has emerged as the = high=20 probability target for the<BR>> > > > termination of this = short=20 term down move. The most likely scenario for<BR>> > > > = tomorrow=20 would be a move slightly lower into the target range or just<BR>> = > >=20 below<BR>> > > > before the market terminates the move, = and begins=20 to go higher. The<BR>> second<BR>> > > > most likely = scenario=20 is that the market will open higher and continue<BR>> to<BR>> = > >=20 > move higher from there. And the third most likely scenario would = be=20 a<BR>> > > > continuation of the down move possibly as low = as 900,=20 with an<BR>> intra-day<BR>> > > > reversal featuring a = closing=20 price above at least 911. Each of these<BR>> > > > = scenarios=20 involves the 910-913 target range.<BR>> > > ><BR>> > = >=20 ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > Despite the high=20 probability that we are about to make a turn and not<BR>> > > = likely<BR>> > > > to go much lower, until we see the turn=20 confirmation signal this<BR>> market<BR>> > > > could = still=20 reach the lower target range<BR>> > > ><BR>> > >=20 ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > E<BR>> > > = ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > = >=20 -<BR>> > > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > ><BR>>=20 = _________________________________________________________________________= ___<BR>>=20 > > > For your protection, this e-mail message has been = scanned for=20 viruses.<BR>> > > > Visit us at <A=20 href=3D"http://www.neoris.com/">http://www.neoris.com/</A><BR>> = > >=20 ><BR>> > > > -<BR>> > > > -To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > > > -<BR>> = >=20 > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; >=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email.<BR>>=20 > > ><BR>> > > ><BR>> > ><BR>> >=20 ><BR>> > > -<BR>> > > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, = email=20 "<A = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ;=20 > > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> = > >=20 -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<BR>> = ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> <BR>> <BR>> -<BR>> -To = subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>>= ; -In=20 the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>> -"unsubscribe=20 canslim". Do not use quotes in your = email.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20 subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe = canslim". Do=20 not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_05C7_01C25013.38EAAE20-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Ernie's Forecasts "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]