RE: [CANSLIM] Time saving (was: Off-topic -- question re: cwhcharts.com)

From: "Mike Gibbons" <mikegibbons@proactech.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Time saving (was: Off-topic -- question re: cwhcharts.com)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 22:30:33 -1000

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] WORLEY'S WATCHLIST WANNABES, timesaving "Ann"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] WORLEY'S WATCHLIST WANNABES, timesaving Fanus
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Hi Hermann,

I'm not sure what you are trying to say here, but I'm not sure I like it. It
appears insulting to Tom and that's unnecessary.  I believe we will all get
greater benefit from showing respect for each other's points of view rather
than the combative approach you seem to be taking here.

Everyone has their own view on the appropriate order in which to apply
screenings based on technicals vs fundamentals. In this market, we are all
living in glass houses. Personally I avoid throwing stones.

I monitor the activity on my site and I'm a long way from concluding that
the activity of this group exceeds the benefit I get from the postings of
Tom and others.

Oh, and if you find my site useful, and are afraid I might ban access to it,
why not subscribe to it?

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Hermann Ertl
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 8:50 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Time saving (was: Off-topic -- question re:
cwhcharts.com)



> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 08:51:23 -0600
> From: Warren Keuffel <wkeuffel@xmission.com>
snip
> My question: is it possible to scan for cwh handle formations
> a from watch list that is uploaded to the site?



> From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 10:58:54 -0400
>
> and my guess is that it quickly would swamp Mike's site, and he could no
> longer offer us this out of his generosity. probably better that we do our
> own screening according to our best devices, then punch in the pick of the
> litter for another opinion.



Now that you said it Mike will become aware of the problem and
will ban access to his site. That will be bad especially for you -
working 14 hour a day, six times a week - because you could have
used his computer to do a rough weekly screening of thousands of
issues, then punch into your brain the pick of the litter for
another opinion according to your best devices. This way would be
much more efficient than the other way around.






- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.