From: "Edward W. Gjertsen II" <ed@macktracks.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:59:15 -0500
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "david frank"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Weinstein & Professional Tape Reader Warren Keuffel
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
No one should be wondering why Weinstein's or any other professional's performance is poor relative to what they write or "should" be doing. Human nature is a cruel element in investing. We are often at odds between the logical and emotional aspect of our lives. Investing is one of the most disciplined games around. I often compare investing/trading to professional golf. In both, there is no excuse for poor performance other than you. They are both an above the shoulders game. Your mind can be your worst enemy or your best friend. What separates the top 10 golfers in the world from the rest of the pack? Mental toughness, discipline and being prepared. Truly great investors work just as hard preparing themselves mentally as they do searching for the next big move. Like WON, your investment discipline should be your own. Pulling an idea here, pulling an idea there, creating a methodology that YOU are comfortable with should be everyone's quest on this board. Didn't mean to get heavy here, but if you want good, consistent results, work just as hard on the mental aspect of your investing. Ed Gjertsen II ed@macktracks.com - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Warren Keuffel Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:43 AM To: CANSLIM list Subject: [CANSLIM] Weinstein & Professional Tape Reader Someone on the list recently suggested that we should cast a jaundiced eye on Stan Weinstein's book because of his poor market performance. I wrote to the Hulbert Financial Digest (they track newsletter portfolio performance) and below is what they had to say. It looks like he missed the bull market entirely, which I find surprising considering his emphasis on technical analysis. So, what do you think? Should we toss out Weinstein's ideas because what he writes is not supported by real-world performance? (Katherine -- any comment?) Warren John wrote: > Hello, > > We tracked the Professional Tape reader from July, 1980 through the end of > 1999 which is when they had stopped publishing. During this time he had > gained 1.3% per year versus 17.1% per year for the market. Since we no > longer track it, it does not show up in the ratings any longer. > > John Kimble > Hulbert Financial Digest - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "david frank"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Weinstein & Professional Tape Reader Warren Keuffel
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]