Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray


From: Cwyndham@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:48:58 EDT

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray RWElmer@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- --part1_108.175bc8b1.2aa6965a_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

In a message dated 9/3/2002 5:14:16 PM Central Daylight Time, 
kmalm@earthlink.net writes:


> If track record is a prerequisite for judging content, then you may as well
> chuck CANSLIM out the window....as there is no official record of WON's
> yearly results since 1960-something when he began. Guess that means that
> CANSLIM has no value because WON and/or the IBD doesn't even *have* a
> Hulbert rating.
> 
> Katherine

From the loss in subscribers to the newspaper and other offerings I think 
that many people are chucking CANSLIM. Folks didn't care about performance 
with a bull markets wind at their back but now it's a different story. I for 
one want to know "where's the beef." I am sad to say I couldn't find any 
data.

Wyndy
 

- --part1_108.175bc8b1.2aa6965a_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">In a message dated 9/3/2002 5:14:16 PM Central Daylight Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">If track record is a prerequisite for judging content, then you may as well<BR>
chuck CANSLIM out the window....as there is no official record of WON's<BR>
yearly results since 1960-something when he began. Guess that means that<BR>
CANSLIM has no value because WON and/or the IBD doesn't even *have* a<BR>
Hulbert rating.<BR>
<BR>
Katherine</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
From the loss in subscribers to the newspaper and other offerings I think that many people are chucking CANSLIM. Folks didn't care about performance with a bull markets wind at their back but now it's a different story. I for one want to know "where's the beef." I am sad to say I couldn't find any data.<BR>
<BR>
Wyndy<BR>
 </FONT></HTML>

- --part1_108.175bc8b1.2aa6965a_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray RWElmer@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.