From: Fanus <fanus13@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 20:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Off-topic: Tech signal alerts "John Solarno"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Fred Richards"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Wyndy I do not understand the point you are trying to make. You seems to doubt that CANSLIM is working and want to see results. AAII made rules to try to simulate CANSLIM. This is maybe not 100% CANSLIM, but is a good mechanicl approach to CANSLIM. The fact that it doens use the chart patterns should make it even more impressive. If they were to use the results from the screen and filtered out the ones which doesn't mathc the chart patterns, results probably would have been better. But you do not want to believe the results based on strict and consistent rules. Yet you are looking for backtested results based on subjective interpretations based on chart formations. One person will see a cup with handle and another one won't. You cannot easily put chart formations in a mechanical screen. What will you learn from results from IBD, or anyone one else which based their trading on a CANSLIM approach based in their own interpretations? Their will be no way for you to repeat their results exactly. The bottom line is that CANSLIM is not a mechanical screen. It is an investment method. As such there is no one way you can produce historical results. Just like you get Growth investing and Value investing. Within each one, you get many different approaches. You have to find the method working the best for you. After reading HTMMIS you have to decide for yourself if it make sense for you and if you are comfortable with it. If you don't, then don't use it. It is as simple as that. No one here have to prove to you that CANSLIM work. It work for me and I am happy with it and if it doesn't work for you and you don't like it, well frankly, I don't care. I will answer questions you have about the methodology if I can, but I am not going to provide you my broker statements, or any kind of prove. - - Fanus - --- Cwyndham@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/3/2002 9:23:24 PM Central > Daylight Time, > ffradrich@attbi.com writes: > > > > Over 40 years ago, I started on the Street to > become a security analyst. > > Fortunately, I had some great mentors and teachers > as well as a bible, > > "Graham & Dodd's Security Analysis." Needless to > say, I am still learning . > > . . Katherine has a unique insight into the market > and what makes it tick. > > > > Thank you. I don't know Katherine is she a trader. > Have you seen her > performance in order to know that her results are > good? I sent a registered > letter to IBD earlier today and have asked them for > their performance data. > > OH! The AAII data is not CANSLIM traded. They don't > buy or sell according to > chart > formations/patterns/breakouts/volume/handles/cups/saucers > or anything > else. I have been an AAII member for 3 years, go > check the way they trade. > Hope no one uses their CANSLIM data to substantiate > the use of CANSLIM. > > Wyndy > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Off-topic: Tech signal alerts "John Solarno"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Tom Worley"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Fred Richards"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Why Professionals go astray "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]