[CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


From: "david frank" <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 14:06:22 -0500

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C254E5.6A5DA080
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL section of today's =
IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The interesting part =
of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 weeks long, did =
not really count as a base, because it was shorter in duration and =
shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving average, than the =
other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day moving average =
before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. Read this, =
and look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I missing =
something here? David

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C254E5.6A5DA080
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I found something very interesting in =
the ASK BILL=20
section of today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. =
The=20
interesting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 =
weeks=20
long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter in=20
duration&nbsp;and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving =
average,=20
than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day moving =
average=20
before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. Read this, =
and=20
look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I missing something =
here?=20
David</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_00E9_01C254E5.6A5DA080--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.