From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:16:51 -0500
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi Mike, From an intermediate term CANSLIM perspective, negative divergence can signal both "stay away from a potential breakout" and/or "time to sell," depending on the technical condition, the market, etc. From a short term trading perspective, and from a short-seller's point of view, negative divergence can signal a setup. Whether one would short off a failing top (and/or breakout) or as a pullback/continuation in a downward trend is a matter of preference. The little bit that WON addresses on shorting, he much prefers continuations in downward trends....scouting setups when RS<=30 and other fundamental indicators are lagging. This is one of the reasons why there's a big "gap" in the RS's if you look at a DGO printed product company report. You'll see a lot of stocks with RS>=70ish (long setups) and a lot with RS<=30 to 40ish (short setups) and not much in between. Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: <michael_niemotka@baxter.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | | Is negative divergence a good sign to spot a good short candidate? | | | Mike Niemotka , PE | Sr. Principal Engineer | Baxter Healthcare Corporation | Route 120 & Wilson Road | Round Lake, IL 60073 | Tel (847) 270-4075 | Fax (847) 270-4525 | michael_niemotka@baxter.com | | | | "Katherine Malm" | <kmalm@earthlink.net> To: canslim@lists.xmission.com | Sent by: cc: | owner-canslim@lists.xm Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | ission.com | | | 09/05/2002 10:18 AM | Please respond to | canslim | | | | | | | Hi Dan, | | Absolutely and good point...just a specific kind of divergence, i.e. Price | v. Volume action. | | CANSLIM has several good divergence indicators such as price rising while | the RS Line is nonconfirming...i.e. diverging...price moving up and the RS | Line moving down. (negative divergence) A good positive divergence | indicator | is price falling back or moving sideways with the RS line moving up. Good | indication that this stock is building steam and outperforming relative to | the market, despite the price action. | | Katherine | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Dan Forant" <dforant1@nycap.rr.com> | To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:51 AM | Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | | | | Also divergence? | | | | DanF | | ----- Original Message ----- | | From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net> | | To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | | Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 10:41 AM | | Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | | | | | | > Here's a good wedging example: | | > http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PHA090402.jpg | | > | | > ----- Original Message ----- | | > From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net> | | > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | | > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:37 AM | | > Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | | > | | > | | > | Hi Kelly, | | > | | | > | For the most part, the action on the right side of CECO's "V" cup was | | > | wedging, just as you noted. You had to pick the toughest chart in the | | > | *universe* though.... Prior to that sudden V-cup, the basing action | was | | > | actually constructive. Since then, it's pretty much a nightmare of | | > activity | | > | and very difficult to read. The first area you marked as a pivot is | iffy | | > for | | > | 2 reasons. First, the base, having been so deep, has to be at least 6 | | > weeks | | > | in length to be valid. That means the earliest a valid pivot could | form | | > | would be about 8/2. You can see the action there is a little suspect, | | > | forming a sloppy handle at best. In the handle itself, you actually | want | | > to | | > | see volume dry up, but the problem is that this stock took a big | plunge | | at | | > | the start of the handle. One could certainly argue that the handle | | "moved | | > | sideways" but I'd be disinclined to do so because of the wedging | action | | to | | > | get there. That, combined with a very low volume breakout attempt on | | 8/15 | | > | just seals the deal...this stock didn't want to go *anywhere.* I'll | bet | | > the | | > | strong action in the group has had more to do with it's ability to | hang | | in | | > | there than anything else. I wouldn't, as a result look at the high | 8/16 | | as | | > a | | > | "pivot" but instead a pull back into the base. The only thing that | can | | > save | | > | CECO at this point is a nice tight sideways consolidation on quiet | | volume. | | > | If it can do that, then I'd say it's ready to move on. If it stays | wide | | > and | | > | loose as it's been, then hasta la vista baby. | | > | | | > | Katherine | | > | ----- Original Message ----- | | > | From: "Kelly Short" <kshort@kellyrshort.com> | | > | To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> | | > | Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:34 PM | | > | Subject: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO | | > | | | > | | | > | | Katherine, | | > | | | | > | | To continue your point on wedging- would this stock be an example | of | | > | wedging | | > | | action? | | > | | | | > | | http://www.kellyrshort.com/canslim/CECOwedgeexample.gif | | > | | | | > | | Kelly | | > | | | | > | | - | | > | | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | | > | | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | | > | | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | > | | | > | | | > | - | | > | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | | > | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | | > | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | > | | > | | > - | | > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | | > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | | > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | > | | | | | | - | | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | | - | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | | | | | | | - | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Wedging example: CECO "Dan Forant"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]