Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


From: "david frank" <camelot.homes@charter.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:57:10 -0500

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "david frank"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "NANCY POLCARO"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "NANCY POLCARO"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Katherine, I believe these are the most confusing statements, I have =
read from IBD. One thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a =
fairly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout =
of PNRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on =
May 30th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure. =
david
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Katherine Malm=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


  Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sure =
I've ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to =
read it a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that =
"short-term correction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an =
invalid base from which I would have avoided chasing any sort of =
breakout.  See my read on things at:

  http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg

  Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." =
Oh well, live and learn.

  Katherine
    ----- Original Message -----=20
    From: david frank=20
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:06 PM
    Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


    I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL section of =
today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The =
interesting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 =
weeks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter in =
duration and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving =
average, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its =
50-day moving average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this =
as a base. Read this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of =
PNRA. Am I missing something here? David

- ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine, I believe these are the most =
confusing=20
statements, I have read from IBD. One thing of interest is before The =
"Tacoma=20
Narrows" is a fairly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out =
of the=20
breakout of PNRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and =
failed on=20
May 30th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure.=20
david</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
  Malm</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, September 05, =
2002 2:22=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA =
base=20
  criterion</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not =
sure I've=20
  ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to read =
it a=20
  few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-term =
correction"=20
  area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid base from which =
I would=20
  have avoided chasing any sort of breakout.&nbsp; See my read on things =

  at:</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg">http://WallStre=
et-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg</A></DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid =
base." Oh=20
  well, live and learn.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Katherine</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    <A title=3Dcamelot.homes@charter.net=20
    href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">david frank</A> </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
    =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
    </DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, September 05, =
2002 2:06=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] PNRA base=20
    criterion</DIV>
    <DIV><BR></DIV>
    <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I found something very interesting =
in the ASK=20
    BILL section of today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth =
stage base.=20
    The interesting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, =
although 9=20
    weeks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter =
in=20
    duration&nbsp;and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day =
moving=20
    average, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its =
50-day=20
    moving average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as =
a base.=20
    Read this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am =
I=20
    missing something here?=20
David</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_010C_01C25505.A878ED50--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "david frank"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "NANCY POLCARO"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "NANCY POLCARO"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.