Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


From: "NANCY POLCARO" <ZILLAGIRL@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 17:19:25 -0700

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "david frank"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis James Bond
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thank You Katherine for the charts you put up with explanations of how yo=
u are reading them.  This has helped me more then anything else to try to=
 learn chart reading.  If anyone else would consider doing this it would =
be great for us that are new to reading the charts.  I guess I shouldn't =
speak for the others but as for me' it is really helpful.  Thanks in adva=
nce to you.  Nancy
 =20
- ----- Original Message -----
From: david frank
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:48 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion
 =20
Katherine, I believe these are the most confusing statements, I have read=
 from IBD. One thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a fair=
ly nice flat base, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout of P=
NRA's CwH 2nd handle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on May 30=
th, and a double bottom started on June 4th from this failure. david
- ----- Original Message ----- =20
From: Katherine Malm =20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =20
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sure I've e=
ver heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to read it =
a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-term corre=
ction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid base from w=
hich I would have avoided chasing any sort of breakout.  See my read on t=
hings at:
 =20
http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg
 =20
Maybe "short term correction" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." Oh=
 well, live and learn.
 =20
Katherine
- ----- Original Message ----- =20
From: david frank =20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =20
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:06 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion


I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL section of today's IBD=
. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The interesting part of =
the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 weeks long, did not =
really count as a base, because it was shorter in duration and shallower;=
 didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving average, than the other 3 bas=
es. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day moving average before climbi=
ng again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. Read this, and look at b=
oth the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I missing something here? Dav=
id

- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#ffffff" STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;b=
ackground-color:#ffffff; "><DIV>Thank You Katherine for the charts you pu=
t up with explanations of how you are reading them.&nbsp; This has helped=
 me more then anything else to try to learn chart reading.&nbsp; If anyon=
e else would consider doing this it would be great for us that are new to=
 reading the charts.&nbsp; I guess I shouldn't speak for the others but&n=
bsp;as for me' it is&nbsp;really helpful.&nbsp; Thanks&nbsp;in advance to=
 you.&nbsp; Nancy</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RI=
GHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px s=
olid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original =
Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; =
COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> david frank</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Ari=
al"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, September 05, 2002 3:48 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D=
"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> canslim@lists.xmission.com</DIV> <DIV style=
=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion</=
DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGEN=
ERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE>  <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine, I be=
lieve these are the most confusing statements, I have read from IBD. One =
thing of interest is before The "Tacoma Narrows" is a fairly nice flat ba=
se, of around 7 weeks, which came out of the breakout of PNRA's CwH 2nd h=
andle. This flat base didn't breakout and failed on May 30th, and a doubl=
e bottom started on June 4th from this failure. david</FONT></DIV> <BLOCK=
QUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LE=
FT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D=
"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACK=
GROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A tit=
le=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine Ma=
lm</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcansl=
im@lists.xmission.com href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@=
lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B=
> Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:22 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt ari=
al"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion</DIV> <DIV><BR></DI=
V> <DIV>Good grief, David. I read that and went "news to me!".....not sur=
e I've ever heard WON describe something quite this way, so will have to =
read it a few times to absorb the point of view. I look at that "short-te=
rm correction" area very differently. That is, I see it as an invalid bas=
e from which I would have avoided chasing any sort of breakout.&nbsp; See=
 my read on things at:</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV><A href=3D"http://wal=
lstreet-llc.com/canslim/PNRA090502.jpg">http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim=
/PNRA090502.jpg</A></DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>Maybe "short term correc=
tion" is just a fancy term for "invalid base." Oh well, live and learn.</=
DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV> <DIV>Katherine</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D=
"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0=
00000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----=
- - Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: =
10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=3Dcamelot.homes@char=
ter.net href=3D"mailto:camelot.homes@charter.net">david frank</A> </DIV> =
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmiss=
ion.com href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission=
.com</A> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, Se=
ptember 05, 2002 2:06 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject=
:</B> [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=
=3DArial size=3D2>I found something very interesting in the ASK BILL sect=
ion of today's IBD. It talks about PNRA and its fourth stage base. The in=
teresting part of the answer is that the previous CwH base, although 9 we=
eks long, did not really count as a base, because it was shorter in durat=
ion&nbsp;and shallower; didn't dip closer to to its 200-day moving averag=
e, than the other 3 bases. Also, spent lesser time under its 50-day movin=
g average before climbing again. Thus, they don't count this as a base. R=
ead this, and look at both the daily and weekly charts of PNRA. Am I miss=
ing something here? David</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQU=
OTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C25500.625FC640--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis "david frank"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] CSTR CVH Failed breakouts Post Analysis James Bond
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] PNRA base criterion "david frank"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.