Re: Fw: [CANSLIM] For Tom W.

From: Cwyndham@aol.com
Subject: Re: Fw: [CANSLIM] For Tom W.
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 10:56:53 EDT

Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] CANSLIM List FAQ "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: Fw: [CANSLIM] For Tom W. "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: Fw: [CANSLIM] For Tom W. "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

- --part1_4c.113f6161.2aae10b5_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Katherine is it doom and gloom or truth and reality? Is your vision clouded 
by the past? Certainly CANSLIM has been a losing strategy for most of  those 
that have attemmpted it since mid 2000 (this I learned from private email 
sent to me by members of this group). Oh, you're going to say IBD said to 
stay out, well that's not true either. They've called several bottoms.  
Staying in cash just means that most all of the IBD faithful lost a fantastic 
opportunity to short the market, to say nothing about losing ground to 
stealth inflation. The wavers have been totally on the ball for the past 2+ 
years and their performance is public and well documented. You might check 
them out instead of lumping them with others and scoffing at them. Whereas 
IBD still hasn't responded to my registered letter.  

Wyndy

In a message dated 9/8/2002 11:36:18 PM Central Daylight Time, 
kmalm@earthlink.net writes:


> 
> Hi Gene,
>  
> I was referring to Prechter's stance on stock cycles and doom and gloom 
> based on Elliott Wave analysis, so was tongue-in-cheek suggesting an 
> economics text to balance the view. (I think his "Tidal Wave" Bear book 
> came out in 95 or 96. Add him to the stack with Ravi Batra "The Great 
> Depression of 1990" and, just to be fair, "Dow 36000" and "Dow 100000"). 
> Either way, all things are possible.
>  
> Katherine
> 


- --part1_4c.113f6161.2aae10b5_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0">Katherine is it doom and gloom or truth and reality? Is your vision clouded by the past? Certainly CANSLIM has been a losing strategy for most of&nbsp; those that have attemmpted it since mid 2000 (this I learned from private email sent to me by members of this group). Oh, you're going to say IBD said to stay out, well that's not true either. They've called several bottoms.&nbsp; Staying in cash just means that most all of the IBD faithful lost a fantastic opportunity to short the market, to say nothing about losing ground to stealth inflation. The wavers have been totally on the ball for the past 2+ years and their performance is public and well documented. You might check them out instead of lumping them with others and scoffing at them. Whereas IBD still hasn't responded to my registered letter.&nbsp; <BR>
<BR>
Wyndy<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 9/8/2002 11:36:18 PM Central Daylight Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"><BR>
Hi Gene,<BR>
 <BR>
I was referring to Prechter's stance on stock cycles and doom and gloom based on Elliott Wave analysis, so was tongue-in-cheek suggesting an economics text to balance the view. (I think his "Tidal Wave" Bear book came out in 95 or 96. Add him to the stack with Ravi Batra "The Great Depression of 1990" and, just to be fair, "Dow 36000" and "Dow 100000"). Either way, all things are possible.<BR>
 <BR>
Katherine<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_4c.113f6161.2aae10b5_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.