From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:58:05 -0600
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] ICUI "Mike Gibbons"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Boyd"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Lots of overhead supply in the 45-50 range, plus like you said, an ugly looking handle. They do seem to make good quality stuff though... On 11 Sep 2002 at 12:52, David Taggart wrote: > I came across COLM. Looks like a decent CUP/Handle. The handle went a > little lower than I like but otherwise chart looks decent. > > > > C- The past three quarters are lacking. Before that they were > growing at a good rate and the projected earnings look pretty good. > > A- On a year to year basis COLM has done pretty good the G-rate for > the past 5 years has been 30% so it wins the A-prize > > N- It sells coats and stuff so other than new high I don't know > what else would be considered truly new with them. New colors and stuff > but that's about it. > > S- I show 39.5 Million shares so it basically passes the old supply > rule. > > L- It is a leader in its group. > > I- Looks OK nothing to write home about but at least Janus > doesn't own it. > > > > M- Obviously does not pass. > > > > > > So basically decent looking chart+ decent fundamentals yet nothing to > write home about+ crappy market= No trade > > > > > > Not quite sure why I wrote it but there it is. > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Patrick Wahl"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] ICUI "Mike Gibbons"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Boyd"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]