From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 19:22:28 -0500
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] ThomsonFN's I-Watch "Kelly Short"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine = CANSLIM KLall1112@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi Kent, Re: "What we don't see is how many shares bought at some price have really | been sold at a loss, thus decreasing actual overhead supply. | | It would be nice to see how many shares still exist at each buy point | in the past. Even better to see the shares that are inclined to sell on | the way up and those that would hold on for the long run." Short of reading people's minds, I'm not sure how that would be possible! What we *do* know is the amount of activity at different price points and thus, the probability that it will create problems down the road. The only way to gauge that is to: (1) Know how long ago shares exchanged hands at higher prices. The longer ago it was, the less likely people will be itching to get out at those prices. See http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/COLM091102.jpg (2) The pattern of activity at different price points. The more selling activity at a price point, the greater the likelihood that this is a zone of resistance. http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/COLM0911023yrs.jpg (3) The current activity leading up to the breakout area. The U/D volume is a clue. While the stock is in the base, the higher the U/D volume, the greater the likelihood that buying is overcoming selling pressure as the stock nears its breakout. http://WallStreet-LLC.com/canslim/COLM091102CwH.jpg Katherine - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Norman" <kent_norman@yahoo.com> To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM | Please set me straight if the following is in error: | | (Assuming a downward price pattern ) | | The problem with a price and volume is that it only shows how many | shares traded at a certain price. | | When vol decreases, we interpret it as selling pressure diminishing. | Looking at the old prices, we assume there is overhead supply waiting | to bail out if the price ever gets near break even (could be a faulty | assumption). | | What we don't see is how many shares bought at some price have really | been sold at a loss, thus decreasing actual overhead supply. | | It would be nice to see how many shares still exist at each buy point | in the past. Even better to see the shares that are inclined to sell on | the way up and those that would hold on for the long run. | | Regards | Kent Norman | | --- Patrick Wahl <pjwahl@attbi.com> wrote: | > Its still valid though, isn't it? The idea of overhead supply is | > that all those people | > who bought at old highs are just sitting there ready to get out at | > break even if the | > price ever gets back there, I would think that is still the situation | > after a year, | > although as time passes I suppose there is some share turnover as | > people just give | > up. If this seems incorrect, let me know why. | > | > On 11 Sep 2002 at 12:55, Jack Tencza wrote: | > | > > Patrick, Why the overhead supply comment when it | > > hasn't been that high since 7/01? Thanks, Jack | > | > | > | > - | > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. | | ===== | There are 3 kinds of people in the world. Those who can count and those who can't. | | __________________________________________________ | Yahoo! - We Remember | 9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost | http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute | | - | -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" | -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or | -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] ThomsonFN's I-Watch "Kelly Short"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Katherine = CANSLIM KLall1112@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Patrick Wahl"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]