Re: [CANSLIM] COLM

From: "Patrick Wahl" <pjwahl@attbi.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 14:09:05 -0600

Next Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] COLM Kent Norman
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] COLM Jack Tencza
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Patrick Wahl"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM Kent Norman
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Its still valid though, isn't it?  The idea of overhead supply is that all those people 
who bought at old highs are just sitting there ready to get out at break even if the 
price ever gets back there, I would think that is still the situation after a year, 
although as time passes I suppose there is some share turnover as people just give 
up.  If this seems incorrect, let me know why.

On 11 Sep 2002 at 12:55, Jack Tencza wrote:

> Patrick, Why the overhead supply comment when it
> hasn't been that high since 7/01? Thanks, Jack

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.