Re: [CANSLIM] COLM

From: Jack Tencza <jtenz@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 17:26:31 -0700 (PDT)

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] COLM "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

I wondered after 12 months, many would have sold their
positions at a loss. I just thought you might have
some other stock specific resource about overhead
supply. 
- --- Patrick Wahl <pjwahl@attbi.com> wrote:
> Its still valid though, isn't it?  The idea of
> overhead supply is that all those people 
> who bought at old highs are just sitting there ready
> to get out at break even if the 
> price ever gets back there, I would think that is
> still the situation after a year, 
> although as time passes I suppose there is some
> share turnover as people just give 
> up.  If this seems incorrect, let me know why.
> 
> On 11 Sep 2002 at 12:55, Jack Tencza wrote:
> 
> > Patrick, Why the overhead supply comment when it
> > hasn't been that high since 7/01? Thanks, Jack
> 
> 
> 
> -
> -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email
> "majordomo@xmission.com"
> -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
> -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your
email.


=====
Jack

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! - We Remember
9-11: A tribute to the more than 3,000 lives lost
http://dir.remember.yahoo.com/tribute

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.