From: <btriffet@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:52:10 -0700
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) "inderjit"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:07:00 EDT Vanchee1@aol.com wrote: > They all crawled in a hole because the market > is passing them by. Perhaps I'm reading too much into your reply but... are you using a very short term modified canlim approach? Has is worked well for you this year? Perhaps your using more of a swing type approach to canslim? I bring this up as I see this new "rally" looking much like the mid July "rally". Volume is even a bit less (comparing DJ30 charts). Now, I could be wrong and manufacturing production and related employment has suddenly turned around but I can't see how this "rally" can keep it's legs with the current economy. - -Bill - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) "inderjit"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]