Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)


From: <btriffet@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:52:10 -0700

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) "inderjit"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 13:07:00 EDT Vanchee1@aol.com wrote:

> They all crawled in a hole because the market
> is passing them by.

Perhaps I'm reading too much into your reply but... are you using a very short
term modified canlim approach? Has is worked well for you this year? Perhaps
your using more of a swing type approach to canslim?

I bring this up as I see this new "rally" looking much like the mid July
"rally". Volume is even a bit less (comparing DJ30 charts).

Now, I could be wrong and manufacturing production and related employment has
suddenly turned around but I can't see how this "rally" can keep it's legs
with the current economy.

- -Bill


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list)
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) "inderjit"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] test (no messages on the list) Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.