Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:37:27 EDT

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies "Duke Miller"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Boomer Babies michael_niemotka@baxter.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Duke:

     I may have never said anything, but I agree with your concept:  There 
are a lot of baby-boomers out there who (if they live so long) tend to buy 
while they live.  So those companies which cater to them I believe, with you, 
will do well.

     When will they do well?  That is the question.  Why did those not on the 
SOD do better than those on the SOD?  My conclusion:  One of two reasons:  1) 
Who knows or/and 2) Luck of the draw (it's the same reason why the stocks of 
some lousy companies that are losing money rise in price).

     I'd bet that when the Market becomes a bull, though, those "Boomer" 
stocks that are on the SOD (if their ratings are still good) will rage in the 
same direction as the bull.  

jans


In a message dated 10/24/2002 12:14:00 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
dukemill@tampabay.rr.com writes:

<< The Boomer Babies concept that that I passed on several weeks ago was so
 poorly received by this group that I hesitate to bring it up again!  I'm
 not hurt, I promise.  I've never been known to run with the crowd, more
 often than not taking Frost's road less traveled.   
  
 However, dear friends, I have been doing some analysis on the list that
 now contains 84 stocks, and  I've discovered and interesting lack of
 correlation.  Interesting to me, at any rate.  I'll explain: ... >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.