[CANSLIM] Re. Funds

From: Emenar1@aol.com
Subject: [CANSLIM] Re. Funds
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2002 21:21:11 EST

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Re. Funds Vanchee1@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re. Funds Vanchee1@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Re. Funds Vanchee1@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Tom:

      What do you make of a stock where the DG-Online stat. for funds is 
"NA".  I'm looking at SMD, and it has nice aggregate number for mgt. which is 
holding the stock (39%); the weekly chart looks like I'd want to watch it; 
earnings are very nice as is cash flow; it has no debt and ROE is a 
spectacular 59%.  However, not knowing how many funds are holding the stock 
gives me pause.

     How do you analyze a stock when the everything else seems nice, but 
funds say "NA"?

jans  



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.