RE: Fw: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume


From: "Mike Gibbons" <mike@proactech.com>
Subject: RE: Fw: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:43:13 -1000

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ROOM "Norman Boyd"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Any common trading patterns after a secondary offering? "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Fw: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume Fred Winkle
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Bill,

Thank you for making that point. The alerts are intended to supplement th=
e
watchlist information that we post on the site and certainly should not b=
e
used in isolation from the technical analysis we provide, supplemented by
the subscriber's own due diligence from other sources.

This gives me an opportunity to comment that I was a little disconcerted =
to
see yesterday's alert for MVL posted immediately to this group. Apart fro=
m
the misuse of proprietary information, which I'll ignore for now because =
of
the publicity it gives the site, the subscrbers to this list did not have
the benefit of knowing the context in which the alert was posted.

Aloha,

Mike Gibbons
Proactive Technologies, LLC
http://www.proactech.com


- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of
btriffet@earthlink.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:32 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: Fw: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume


Hi Fred,

Let me say while the cwhcharts is a great site, it would be a huge
disservice
to Mike - and now Katherine - to base your buying or selling purely on th=
e
basis of alerts.

Alerts are a great idea (which I also plan to check out)to suppliment oth=
er
sources. I would highly recommend following up with your own due diligenc=
e
of
the stocks fundamentals and recent news events.

Enjoy,

- -Bill Triffet

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 22:43:34 -0600 Fred Winkle <winkle@swbell.net> wrote:

> Down 15 cents at the close but=A0didn't sell
> once I learned that I owned
> a piece of Spider Man. Hopefully he'll throw
> out his web and we'll climb to a
> new high=A0tomorrow.
> =A0
> Fred
> =A0
> =A0
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From:
>   <A title=3Dwinkle@swbell.net
> href=3D"mailto:winkle@swbell.net">Fred Winkle</A>
>
>
>   To: <A title=EFnslim@lists.xmission.com
>
> href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</=
A>
>
>   Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 1:42
>   PM
>   Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume
>
>   Let's see if I can make it 3 for 3. I just
> got an alert from them on MVL
>   and bought it at $9.20 (it's at $9.24). I'll
> look up MVL after I sell it this
>   afternoon. First time to ever buy a stock
> without knowing anything about them
>   (bad).
>   =A0


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] ROOM "Norman Boyd"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Any common trading patterns after a secondary offering? "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Fw: [CANSLIM] UOPX volume Fred Winkle
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.