Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "kentuna" <kentuna@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 14:28:03 -0700
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
- ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C2916A.33C36700
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Katherine,
I know this has been discussed before, but would you kindly define small =
cap and large cap again. What is the actual criteria that is used.
Thanks
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Katherine Malm=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M
Hi Ian,
Just a quick note... re your comment "It is also baffling to me that =
the sectors that stand to benefit the most from coming increases in =
government spending - the defense and security sector - are watching =
this action from the sideline as well."=20
I noticed SFNT powering ahead today. I've also noticed that money is =
definitely coming *out* of the safe-haven defensive issues such as =
healthcare/hospitals, etc. In general, I see far more breakouts than =
I've seen since last year, so all together, still looks promising to me.
Katherine
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ian=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:23 PM
Subject: [CANSLIM] M
Is anyone else finding any "NEW" winners emerging from this buying =
frenzy?
It seems to me that several recent rally leaders are rolling over =
ugly today - HITK, LCI, ACET - while the indices power ahead, propelled =
by the most heavily shorted isues.
It is also baffling to me that the sectors that stand to benefit the =
most from coming increases in government spending - the defense and =
security sector - are watching this action from the sideline as well.
So am I mising the new leaders of the bull, or is this just =
shot-term traders using liquidity to squeeze heavily shorted positions? =
Opinions? Whither 'M'?
Ian
- ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C2916A.33C36700
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff background=3D"">
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Katherine,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know this has been discussed before, =
but would=20
you kindly define small cap and large cap again. What is the actual =
criteria that is used.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dkmalm@earthlink.net =
href=3D"mailto:kmalm@earthlink.net">Katherine=20
Malm</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 21, =
2002 2:04=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] M</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Hi Ian,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just a quick note... re your comment "It is also baffling to me =
that the=20
sectors that stand to benefit the most from coming increases in=20
government spending - the defense and security sector - are watching =
this=20
action from the sideline as well."=20
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I noticed SFNT powering ahead today. I've also noticed that money =
is=20
definitely coming *out* of the safe-haven defensive issues such as=20
healthcare/hospitals, etc. In general, I see far more breakouts than =
I've seen=20
since last year, so all together, still looks promising to me.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dianstm@shaw.ca href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">Ian</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 21, =
2002 3:23=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] M</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Is anyone else finding any "NEW" winners =
emerging from=20
this buying frenzy?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>It seems to me that several recent rally =
leaders are=20
rolling over ugly today - HITK, LCI, ACET - while the indices power =
ahead,=20
propelled by the most heavily shorted isues.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>It is also baffling to me that the sectors that =
stand to=20
benefit the most from coming increases in government spending - =
the=20
defense and security sector - are watching this action from the =
sideline as=20
well.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>So am I mising the new leaders of the bull, or =
is this=20
just shot-term traders using liquidity to squeeze heavily shorted =
positions?=20
Opinions? Whither 'M'?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT =
size=3D2>Ian</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01C2916A.33C36700--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] M "Edward W. Gjertsen II"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]