Re: Info Overload [CANSLIM] (was: Volume and CWH (was M))


From: "Katherine Malm" <kmalm@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Info Overload [CANSLIM] (was: Volume and CWH (was M))
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 11:57:37 -0600

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Volume and CWH (was M) Sol Mayer
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Re. Interesting Highlight Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C29543.03475870
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Sol,

I've been a full time investor since '99 and until a week ago, when I =
agreed to go into business with Mike Gibbons,  found it easiest to tell =
my friends I was "retired." The minute I've tried to explain that I =
manage my own money full time, most folks' eyes glaze over. So, I look =
at investing as a job and devote my time to it during market hours. On =
the other hand, I don't spend all that time trading or researching =
stocks, but instead, use it for more general study of the markets and on =
refining my strategies. I don't think it's realistic to think that any =
individual investor could do a decent job of CANSLIM investing in 15 =
minutes a day, but I think the process can be pared down so that the =
basic work is done in say, 30 minutes a day plus a few hours each =
weekend. I think the secret is to have a very methodical process that =
works effectively for the individual, good tools to support that =
methodology, and a darned good understanding of what makes a stock a =
good CANSLIM candidate. In good markets, it's common that you might find =
80 or 100 very good stocks, but not all of those will be setting up =
simultaneously for breakout from one week to the next, so technicals =
tend to be a very effective way of narrowing the possibilities for =
trades in the upcoming week, and then good sorting/filtering techniques =
will help to put a meaningful sort on the possible candidates so that =
you can do a more extended due diligence only on the top 5 or 10.

My theory on info overload is that learning and understanding work in =
continuous cycles. Early in the cycle, everything is new and everything =
is seemingly important. That's the part of the cycle where I'll open up =
and seek out all possible sources of data, tools, etc., and the part I =
consider to be the chaos stage. As my understanding becomes better, one =
by one I can drop the excess resources and extra tasks so that it allows =
me to concentrate, focus and clearly understand the new info. During =
this stage, I am conscientious about what I call "noise" and will =
steadfastly eliminate anything that is non-value add. A few years ago I =
did that with investing resources. I dropped my subscription to the WSJ =
(after nearly 25 years), all business magazines and the couple of =
investment newsletters that I used. I kept only my subscription to the =
IBD, and in fact, renewed it for 3 years. I then set about to more fully =
use the paid tools that I was using such as DGO and Vectorvest. From =
chaos came a true simplicity. It's easy for me to differentiate now =
between valuable info and noise, and I think that's an outgrowth of the =
simplicity and understanding. As with all cycles, however, it is never =
ending. As soon as I find simplicity, it's time to start a new cycle--I =
open back up and seek out new resources, go through the chaos, the =
understanding, and then the simplicity again. At least it keeps life =
interesting!!

Katherine
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Sol Mayer=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:59 AM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Volume and CWH (was M)


  i'VE BEEN READING YOUR LATEST POSTINGS.=20

  How long do you spend a day on this? Is this your occupation?also do =
you find you get info overload? (that's the way I feel right now)=20

  =20

- ------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C29543.03475870
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:st1 =
=3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>Hi Sol,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I've been a full time investor since '99 and until a week ago, when =
I=20
agreed to go into business with Mike Gibbons, &nbsp;found it easiest to =
tell my=20
friends I was "retired." The minute I've tried to explain that I manage =
my own=20
money full time, most folks' eyes glaze over. So, I look at investing as =
a job=20
and devote my time to it during market hours. On the other hand, I don't =
spend=20
all that time trading or researching stocks, but instead, use it for =
more=20
general study of the markets and on refining my strategies. I don't =
think it's=20
realistic to think that any individual investor could do a decent job of =
CANSLIM=20
investing in 15 minutes a day, but I think the process&nbsp;can be pared =
down so=20
that the basic work is done in say, 30 minutes a day plus a few hours =
each=20
weekend. I think the secret is to have a very methodical process that =
works=20
effectively for the individual, good tools to support that methodology, =
and a=20
darned good understanding of what makes a stock a good CANSLIM =
candidate. In=20
good markets, it's common that you might find 80 or 100 very good =
stocks, but=20
not all of those will be setting up simultaneously for breakout from one =
week to=20
the next, so technicals tend to be a very effective way of narrowing the =

possibilities for trades in the upcoming week, and then good =
sorting/filtering=20
techniques will help to put a meaningful sort on the possible candidates =
so that=20
you can do a more extended due diligence only on the top 5 or 10.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>My theory on info overload is that learning and understanding work =
in=20
continuous cycles. Early in the cycle, everything is new and everything =
is=20
seemingly important. That's the part of the cycle where I'll open up and =
seek=20
out all possible sources of data, tools, etc., and the part I consider =
to be the=20
chaos stage. As my understanding becomes better, one by one I can drop =
the=20
excess resources and extra tasks so that it allows me to concentrate, =
focus and=20
clearly understand the new info. During this stage, I am conscientious =
about=20
what I call "noise" and will steadfastly eliminate anything that is =
non-value=20
add. A&nbsp;few years ago I did that with investing resources. I dropped =
my=20
subscription to the WSJ (after nearly 25 years), all business magazines =
and the=20
couple of investment newsletters that I used. I kept only my =
subscription to the=20
IBD, and in fact, renewed it for 3 years. I then set about to more fully =
use the=20
paid tools that I was using such as DGO and Vectorvest. From chaos came =
a true=20
simplicity. It's easy for me to differentiate now between valuable info =
and=20
noise, and I think that's an outgrowth of the simplicity and =
understanding. As=20
with all cycles, however, it is never ending. As soon as I find =
simplicity, it's=20
time to start a new cycle--I open back up and seek out new resources, go =
through=20
the chaos, the understanding, and then the simplicity again. At least it =
keeps=20
life interesting!!</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Katherine</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dsmaye1211@yahoo.com href=3D"mailto:smaye1211@yahoo.com">Sol =
Mayer</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, November 26, =
2002 8:59=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Volume =
and CWH=20
  (was M)</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <P>i'VE BEEN READING YOUR LATEST POSTINGS.=20
  <P>How long do you spend a day on this? Is this your occupation?also =
do you=20
  find you get info overload? (that's the way I feel right now)=20
  <P>&nbsp;</P></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C29543.03475870--



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Volume and CWH (was M) Sol Mayer
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Re. Interesting Highlight Gene Ricci
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.