Re: [CANSLIM] M

From: AJAskey@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:32:25 EST

Next Article (by Author): RE: [CANSLIM] Volume and CWH (was M) "Curt Corley"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] M AJAskey@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

- --part1_165.1756b9a7.2b18f099_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Definately agree shorting isn't the best play now.  

In a message dated 11/29/2002 7:18:51 AM Central Standard Time, 
stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:


> I have yet to find a short where I have confidence in doubling my money, and 
> the indexes appear to be clearing up the mystery of the double bottom / 
> head & shoulders / c&h patterns in favor of the double bottom, so shorting 
> is not even a consideration for me right now.


- --part1_165.1756b9a7.2b18f099_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Definately agree shorting isn't the best play now.&nbsp; <BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 11/29/2002 7:18:51 AM Central Standard Time, stkguru@bellsouth.net writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">I have yet to find a short where I have confidence in doubling my money, and the indexes appear to be clearing up the mystery of the double bottom / head &amp; shoulders / c&amp;h patterns in favor of the double bottom, so shorting is not even a consideration for me right now.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_165.1756b9a7.2b18f099_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.