RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies


From: "Fred Richards" <ffradrich@attbi.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 02:12:40 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT AJAskey@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies AJAskey@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C29CCC.F47EB040
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Any worthwhile profession and/or endeavor requires patience, time and =
money to try to learn. Even then, not all who start stay the course.

I think one of the best things you did was to stay out of the market =
since you were unwilling to trade on the short side. . . something that =
is extremely risky for most people.  I know many investors who lost =
their shirts trying to buck the market and thinking it would come back.  =


The CANSLIM system prevents you from losing much money if done =
correctly.  But in any bear market, there will always be a number of =
stocks that do well.  TSCO being one of those the past year.  It was =
identified through CANSLIM filters.
  -----Original Message-----
  From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of NANCY POLCARO
  Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 12:04 AM
  To: canslim
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies


  I would just like to put in my opinion if possible. For people who are =
just learning the IBD system and doing all the wrong things and not =
making money(especially in this market) it is a big expense-on top of no =
profits and maybe losing money. For people who have traded for 40 years =
and have their own web site and know Bill O'neil personally, I'm sure it =
is well worth the money.  I think the problem is -how do you learn the =
system   when you have no stock market background unless you pay that =
much  money just to try to learn. I had the paper for two years.  I =
thought I was learning it but in fact I was just doing well because I =
was caught up in the last two years of a raging bull market.  I let the =
paper go  when stocks were going no where but down.  When the market =
turns I will probably try it again but in the mean time it is to big of =
an expense to pay for training.  Especially if we have a 10 year bear.  =
Sorry if I ask simple questions right now, but the books and this web =
site are where I'm being taught right now. I want to thank everyone on =
this site for all the help and training you offer the rest of us.  nancy

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Fred Richards
    Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:35 PM
    To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
    Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies

    Curt,

    After some 40 years in this business, I believe that one of the =
guidelines my mentor pounded into my head is still applicable.

    "You get what you pay for in this business."

    Fred
      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Curt Corley
      Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:22 PM
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
      Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies


      Fred,

      =20

      I was just joking about the online service.  Maybe I should have =
put a =E2=80=9C;)=E2=80=9D after that statement, instead of a =
=E2=80=9C:).=E2=80=9D =20

      =20

      I agree with the idea that the cost is not very significant if you =
are able to make significantly more than $500 using DGO and IBD =
=E2=80=93 especially if you are unable to make that amount without DGO.  =
However, that could very well strengthen the argument in favor of lower =
cost, because (1) there are quite a few people out there who are not in =
your position and who don=E2=80=99t have the starting capital and/or =
skills to make a significant amount over $500, and (2) there are quite a =
few people out there who can make significant money without the service. =
 ;)

      =20

      Curt

      =20

      -----Original Message-----
      From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Fred Richards
      Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:36 PM
      To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
      Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies

      =20

      And just how much will you charge?  Have you given any =
consideration to the costs involved?  Or how many people might sign up =
for another stock rating service?

      =20

      It is always great to leverage off other people's work but unless =
you can make a profit after all the costs both known and unknown are =
caculated, don't  make the number 1 mistake of most entrepreneurs . . . =
failing to consider the cost of one's time.

      =20

      Since I make a few more dollars than $500 using the DGO and IBD, =
the cost is only material to those who don't.

        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Curt Corley
        Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:15 PM
        To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
        Subject: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies

        Hi,

        =20

        I hope you don=E2=80=99t mind me changing the subject name of =
this thread to something a little more appropriate than NXTL and SXT.=20

        =20

        To answer your question:  Yes, I would certainly consider =
purchasing a stock if the ROE was less than 16.5% with all other factors =
looking good.  As you know, I=E2=80=99ve purchased PECS and MNTR =
recently -- two stocks that were a lot less perfect than the theoretical =
stock you mentioned.  I get your point, and you are right:  an ROE below =
17% certainly does not mean the company or the stock is bad.  But =
here=E2=80=99s a situation to consider.  Let=E2=80=99s say you have =
screened 9,100+ stocks, and came up with a dozen or so stocks that have =
what you consider to be near-perfect fundamentals.  And let=E2=80=99s =
say a few of those look like they might break out of a base formation =
within the next couple of weeks.  Would you rather wait around for the =
possibility that those stocks with the best fundamentals will break out? =
 Or would rather purchase stocks that have already broken out but which =
have less stellar fundamentals?  Within a very short time after =
purchasing PECS and MNTR, I saw other stocks with better fundamentals =
that looked like they were ready to make a move.  Of course, =
that=E2=80=99s a tough thing to watch, and that=E2=80=99s why I put some =
thought into this question.  Given my situation and my personality, I =
decided I would rather keep my eye on only the very best ones.  =
That=E2=80=99s why I decided last weekend to screen only the =
near-perfect ones and keep an eye on those.  And now you, Andy, and Tom =
are starting to make me doubt that decision.  Thanks a lot!  :)

        =20

        Seriously now:  this has been a very educational and interesting =
thread.  Hopefully, by the time we are through with this, we will have =
figured out the best overall stock-picking system; then we can start an =
on-line rating system and screening service that doesn=E2=80=99t cost =
$500 a year.  :)

        =20

        Curt

        =20

        P.S. =E2=80=93 I would like to open a topic up some time in the =
future about the use of earnings estimates.  But this topic is enough =
for now.  My laptop is over-heating.  I=E2=80=99m coming into work =
tired.  And my wife is starting to forget my middle name.

        =20

        -----Original Message-----
        From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of kmalm
        Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 11:44 AM
        To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
        Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT

        =20

        Hi Curt,

        =20

        I think you've identified the stickier issues in CANSLIM and =
interpreting WON's work. As both Tom and Andy have pointed out in their =
posts, while WON may *seem* to be stating that ROE>=3D17 is a "minimum =
requirement' it turns out it is a guidepost to lead you to better =
quality stocks. As with other indicators, this is based on his =
historical view of winning stocks, meaning that "on average" winning =
stocks had an ROE>=3D17. As with D/E, ROE can be misleading. For =
example, if a company rejiggers their capital structure and increases =
their outstanding shares, this will have an immediate impact on the ROE =
measure. Another way of viewing it would simply be by asking a question. =
That is, if you were looking at a stock and it had a "perfect" cup with =
handle (ok, it's theoretical!); high RS Rank; an RS line making new =
highs; met all other earnings, sales and profit margin guidelines, and =
broke out on 150% of ADV, would you pass it up because it had an ROE of =
16.5%? If so, why? Does the "low" ROE mean that it is not a good company =
or a good stock?

        =20

        Katherine

          =20


- ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C29CCC.F47EB040
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns:o =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:st1 =
=3D=20
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY=20
style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FONT: 10pt =
verdana; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; =
BACKGROUND-COLOR: white"=20
bgColor=3Dwhite>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D880040608-06122002><FONT face=3Dverdana>Any =
worthwhile profession=20
and/or endeavor requires patience, time and money to try to learn. Even =
then,=20
not all who start&nbsp;stay the course.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D880040608-06122002></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D880040608-06122002><FONT face=3Dverdana>I think one =
of the best=20
things you did was to stay out of the market since you were unwilling to =
trade=20
on the short side. . . something that is extremely risky for most =
people.&nbsp;=20
I know many investors who lost their shirts trying to buck the market =
and=20
thinking it would come back.&nbsp; </FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D880040608-06122002></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D880040608-06122002><FONT face=3Dverdana>The CANSLIM =
system=20
prevents you from losing much money if done correctly.&nbsp; But in any =
bear=20
market, there will always be a number of stocks that do well.&nbsp; TSCO =
being=20
one of those the past year.&nbsp; It was identified through CANSLIM=20
filters.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT=20
  face=3DTahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
  owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>NANCY=20
  POLCARO<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 06, 2002 12:04 =
AM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
  canslim<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental=20
  Philosophies<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
  <DIV>I would just like to put in my opinion if possible. For people =
who are=20
  just learning the IBD system and doing all the wrong things and not =
making=20
  money(especially in this market) it is a big expense-on top of no =
profits and=20
  maybe losing money. For people who have traded for 40 years and have =
their own=20
  web site and know Bill O'neil personally, I'm sure it is well worth =
the=20
  money.&nbsp; I think the problem is -how do you learn the =
system&nbsp;&nbsp;=20
  when you have no stock market background&nbsp;unless you pay that =
much&nbsp;=20
  money just to try to learn. I had the paper for two years.&nbsp; I =
thought I=20
  was learning it but in fact I was just doing well because I was caught =
up in=20
  the last two years of a raging bull market.&nbsp; I let the paper =
go&nbsp;=20
  when stocks were going no where but down.&nbsp; When the market turns =
I will=20
  probably try it again but in the mean time it is to big of an expense =
to pay=20
  for training.&nbsp; Especially if we have a 10 year bear.&nbsp; Sorry =
if I ask=20
  simple questions right now, but the books and this web site are where =
I'm=20
  being taught right now. I want to thank everyone on this site for all =
the help=20
  and training you offer the rest of us.&nbsp; nancy</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message -----</DIV>
    <DIV=20
    style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
    Fred Richards</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 05, =
2002 9:35=20
    PM</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> =
canslim@lists.xmission.com</DIV>
    <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] =
Fundamental=20
    Philosophies</DIV>
    <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <META content=3DWord.Document name=3DProgId>
    <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=3DGENERATOR>
    <META content=3D"Microsoft Word 10" name=3DOriginator><LINK=20
    href=3D"cid:filelist.xml@01C29CA4.53246960" =
rel=3DFile-List><o:SmartTagType=20
    namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"=20
    name=3D"time"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType=20
    namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"=20
    name=3D"date"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType=20
    namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"=20
    name=3D"City"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagType=20
    namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"=20
    name=3D"place"></o:SmartTagType>
    <STYLE>st1\:* { 	BEHAVIOR: url(#default#ieooui) } </STYLE>

    <STYLE>@font-face { 	font-family: Tahoma; } @page Section1 {size: =
8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin: =
.5in; mso-footer-margin: .5in; mso-paper-source: 0; } P.MsoNormal { 	=
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; =
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; =
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } LI.MsoNormal { 	FONT-SIZE: =
12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; =
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; =
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } DIV.MsoNormal { 	FONT-SIZE: =
12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Times New Roman"; =
mso-style-parent: ""; mso-pagination: widow-orphan; =
mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman" } A:link { 	COLOR: blue; =
TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single } SPAN.MsoHyperlink { =
	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: single } =
A:visited { 	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; text-underline: =
single } SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { 	COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: =
underline; text-underline: single } SPAN.EmailStyle17 { 	COLOR: navy; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal; mso-style-noshow: yes; =
mso-ansi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; =
mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; =
mso-bidi-font-family: Arial } SPAN.EmailStyle18 { 	COLOR: navy; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal; mso-style-noshow: yes; =
mso-ansi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; =
mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; =
mso-bidi-font-family: Arial } SPAN.EmailStyle19 { 	COLOR: navy; =
FONT-FAMILY: Arial; mso-style-type: personal-reply; mso-style-noshow: =
yes; mso-ansi-font-size: 10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 10.0pt; =
mso-ascii-font-family: Arial; mso-hansi-font-family: Arial; =
mso-bidi-font-family: Arial } DIV.Section1 { 	page: Section1 } </STYLE>

    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial=20
    color=3D#0000ff>Curt,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial=20
    color=3D#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff>After=20
    some 40 years in this business, I believe that one of the guidelines =
my=20
    mentor pounded into my head is still applicable.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial=20
    color=3D#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff>"You get=20
    what you pay for in this business."</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial=20
    color=3D#0000ff></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
    <DIV><SPAN class=3D180333704-06122002><FONT face=3DArial=20
    color=3D#0000ff>Fred</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
    <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
      <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT=20
      face=3DTahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
      owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
      [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B>On Behalf Of </B>Curt=20
      Corley<BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, December 05, 2002 9:22 =
PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
      canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] =
Fundamental=20
      Philosophies<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
      <DIV class=3DSection1>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">Fred,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I was =
just joking=20
      about the online service.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;=20
      </SPAN>Maybe I should have put a =E2=80=9C;)=E2=80=9D after that =
statement, instead of a=20
      =E2=80=9C:).=E2=80=9D<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;=20
      </SPAN><o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I agree =
with the=20
      idea that the cost is not very significant if you are able to make =

      significantly more than $500 using DGO and IBD =E2=80=93 =
especially if you are=20
      unable to make that amount without DGO.<SPAN=20
      style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>However, that could very =
well=20
      strengthen the argument in favor of lower cost, because (1) there =
are=20
      quite a few people out there who are not in your position and who =
don=E2=80=99t=20
      have the starting capital and/or skills to make a significant =
amount over=20
      $500, and (2) there are quite a few people out there who can make=20
      significant money without the service.<SPAN=20
      style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>;)<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">Curt<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
      size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
Tahoma">-----Original=20
      Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: =
bold">From:</SPAN></B>=20
      owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com =
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=20
      <B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Fred=20
      Richards<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B>=20
      </SPAN></FONT><st1:date Month=3D"12" Day=3D"5" Year=3D"2002"><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
      size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
Tahoma">Thursday,=20
      December 05, 2002</SPAN></FONT></st1:date><FONT face=3DTahoma =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"> =
</SPAN></FONT><st1:time=20
      Minute=3D"36" Hour=3D"20"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">8:36=20
      PM</SPAN></FONT></st1:time><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"><BR><B><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>=20
      canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> RE: [CANSLIM] =
Fundamental=20
      Philosophies</SPAN></FONT></P>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
      size=3D3><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
      <DIV>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial color=3Dblue=20
      size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">And=20
      just how much will you charge?&nbsp; Have you given any =
consideration to=20
      the costs involved?&nbsp; Or how many people might sign up for =
another=20
      stock rating service?</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P></DIV>
      <DIV>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
      size=3D3><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
      <DIV>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial color=3Dblue=20
      size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">It=20
      is always great to leverage off other people's work but unless you =
can=20
      make a profit after all the costs both known and unknown are =
caculated,=20
      don't&nbsp; make the number 1 mistake of most entrepreneurs . . . =
failing=20
      to consider the cost of one's =
time.</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P></DIV>
      <DIV>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
      size=3D3><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
      <DIV>
      <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial color=3Dblue=20
      size=3D2><SPAN=20
      style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: blue; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Since I =
make a=20
      few more dollars than $500 using the DGO and IBD, the cost is only =

      material to those who don't.</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P></DIV>
      <BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in">
        <P class=3DMsoNormal=20
        style=3D"MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0in; mso-margin-top-alt: 0in"><FONT=20
        face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">-----Original=20
        Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: =
bold">From:</SPAN></B>=20
        owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]<B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>Curt=20
        Corley<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> =
Thursday,=20
        December 05, 2002 8:15 PM<BR><B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>=20
        canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [CANSLIM] =
Fundamental=20
        Philosophies</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">Hi,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">I =
hope you=20
        don=E2=80=99t mind me changing the subject name of this thread =
to something a=20
        little more appropriate than NXTL and SXT. =
<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">To =
answer your=20
        question:<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Yes, I =
would=20
        certainly consider purchasing a stock if the ROE was less than =
16.5%=20
        with all other factors looking good.<SPAN=20
        style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>As you know, =
I=E2=80=99ve purchased=20
        </SPAN></FONT><st1:City><st1:place><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3Dnavy=20
        size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">PECS</SPAN></FONT></st1:place></st1:City><FONT=20
        face=3DArial color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> and =
MNTR=20
        recently -- two stocks that were a lot less perfect than the =
theoretical=20
        stock you mentioned.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>I get=20
        your point, and you are right:<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>an ROE below 17% certainly does not mean the company or =
the stock=20
        is bad.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>But =
here=E2=80=99s a=20
        situation to consider.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>Let=E2=80=99s say you have screened 9,100+ stocks, and =
came up with a=20
        dozen or so stocks that have what you consider to be =
near-perfect=20
        fundamentals.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>And =
let=E2=80=99s say=20
        a few of those look like they might break out of a base =
formation within=20
        the next couple of weeks.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>Would you rather wait around for the possibility that =
those=20
        stocks with the best fundamentals will break out?<SPAN=20
        style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Or would rather =
purchase stocks=20
        that have already broken out but which have less stellar=20
        fundamentals?<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>Within a very=20
        short time after purchasing =
</SPAN></FONT><st1:City><st1:place><FONT=20
        face=3DArial color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">PECS</SPAN></FONT></st1:place></st1:City><FONT=20
        face=3DArial color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> and =
MNTR, I=20
        saw other stocks with better fundamentals that looked like they =
were=20
        ready to make a move.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>Of=20
        course, that=E2=80=99s a tough thing to watch, and =
that=E2=80=99s why I put some thought=20
        into this question.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>Given=20
        my situation and my personality, I decided I would rather keep =
my eye on=20
        only the very best ones.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =

        </SPAN>That=E2=80=99s why I decided last weekend to screen only =
the near-perfect=20
        ones and keep an eye on those.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>And now you, Andy, and Tom are starting to make me doubt =
that=20
        decision.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Thanks =
a=20
        lot!<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>:)<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">Seriously=20
        now:<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>this has =
been a very=20
        educational and interesting thread.<SPAN=20
        style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Hopefully, by the time =
we are=20
        through with this, we will have figured out the best overall=20
        stock-picking system; then we can start an on-line rating system =
and=20
        screening service that doesn=E2=80=99t cost $500 a year.<SPAN=20
        style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>:)<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial">Curt<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">P.S. =
=E2=80=93 I would=20
        like to open a topic up some time in the future about the use of =

        earnings estimates.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; =
</SPAN>But=20
        this topic is enough for now.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>My laptop is over-heating.<SPAN style=3D"mso-spacerun: =
yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>I=E2=80=99m coming into work tired.<SPAN =
style=3D"mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;=20
        </SPAN>And my wife is starting to forget my middle=20
        name.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
        color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: =
Arial"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
        size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
Tahoma">-----Original=20
        Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: =
bold">From:</SPAN></B>=20
        owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
        [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] <B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of =
</SPAN></B>kmalm<BR><B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> =
</SPAN></FONT><st1:date=20
        Month=3D"12" Day=3D"5" Year=3D"2002"><FONT face=3DTahoma =
size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">Thursday, =
December 05,=20
        2002</SPAN></FONT></st1:date><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"> =
</SPAN></FONT><st1:time=20
        Minute=3D"44" Hour=3D"11"><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">11:44=20
        AM</SPAN></FONT></st1:time><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"><BR><B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B>=20
        canslim@lists.xmission.com<BR><B><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> RE: [CANSLIM] =
NXTL,=20
        SXT</SPAN></FONT><o:p></o:p></P>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P>
        <DIV>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt">Hi=20
        Curt,<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
        <DIV>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
        <DIV>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt">I think you've =
identified the=20
        stickier issues in CANSLIM and interpreting WON's work. As both =
Tom and=20
        Andy have pointed out in their posts, while WON may *seem* to be =
stating=20
        that ROE&gt;=3D17 is a "minimum requirement' it turns out it is =
a=20
        guidepost to lead you to better quality stocks. As with other=20
        indicators, this is based on his historical view of winning =
stocks,=20
        meaning that "on average" winning stocks had an ROE&gt;=3D17. As =
with D/E,=20
        ROE can be misleading. For example, if a company rejiggers their =
capital=20
        structure and increases their outstanding shares, this will have =
an=20
        immediate impact on the ROE measure. Another way of viewing it =
would=20
        simply be by asking a question. That is, if you were looking at =
a stock=20
        and it had a "perfect" cup with handle (ok, it's theoretical!); =
high RS=20
        Rank; an RS line making new highs; met all other earnings, sales =
and=20
        profit margin guidelines, and broke out on 150% of ADV, would =
you pass=20
        it up because it had an ROE of 16.5%? If so, why? Does the "low" =
ROE=20
        mean that it is not a good company or a good=20
        stock?<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
        <DIV>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
        <DIV>
        <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 1in"><FONT =
face=3D"Times New Roman"=20
        size=3D3><SPAN=20
        style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt">Katherine<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV>
        <BLOCKQUOTE=20
        style=3D"MARGIN-TOP: 5pt; MARGIN-BOTTOM: 5pt; MARGIN-RIGHT: =
0in">
          <P class=3DMsoNormal=20
          style=3D"MARGIN-BOTTOM: 12pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in; =
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0in; mso-margin-top-alt: 0in"><FONT=20
          face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3><SPAN=20
          style=3D"FONT-SIZE: =
12pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>=
</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C29CCC.F47EB040--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT AJAskey@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies AJAskey@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.