From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 08:38:41 -0500
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable interesting point of view, Andy. In contrast to Katherine, I am a = fundies first type, only after I see what I like there do I start = examining the technicals. On the other hand, to get a list of stocks to = examine, I typically use a list of stocks hitting new highs (e.g. = someone else likes them well enough to actually buy them and drive the = price up), so maybe I am starting with technicals, switching to fundies, = then back to different technicals. But bottom line, I have bought a number of stocks where the technicals = were not right at the time, but the fundies were what I looked for. I = had confidence that, in time, the fundies would bring the technicals = into line where those looking first for technicals would become buyers, = and make me a nice profit. More times than not this worked out, but I = think you need to be a long term investor for this attitude to be = profitable. - ----- Original Message -----=20 From: AJAskey@aol.com=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT Katherine, My thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first = 10-20% of the move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what = the fundies are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what = the fundies are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of = making the 20-1500% move from those that can't. Many appear to get sucked in during a good "M" to buying only from a = good base. This works fine but it is tougher to make a reasonable long = term return making only 20% on each positive buy while losing 8% on each = negative buy and then staying in cash during the bad "M". If I were to = make 500% during a good bull run I would have less temptation to try to = make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when I only turned = several 20% gainers into 100% return during the bull. Andy In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM Central Standard Time, = kmalm@earthlink.net writes: To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a meaningful set = of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, = CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn from = their post analysis. - ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1126" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>interesting point of view, Andy. In contrast to = Katherine,=20 I am a fundies first type, only after I see what I like there do I start = examining the technicals. On the other hand, to get a list of stocks to = examine,=20 I typically use a list of stocks hitting new highs (e.g. someone else = likes them=20 well enough to actually buy them and drive the price up), so maybe I am = starting=20 with technicals, switching to fundies, then back to different=20 technicals.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>But bottom line, I have bought a number of = stocks where=20 the technicals were not right at the time, but the fundies were what I = looked=20 for. I had confidence that, in time, the fundies would bring the = technicals into=20 line where those looking first for technicals would become buyers, and = make me a=20 nice profit. More times than not this worked out, but I think you need = to be a=20 long term investor for this attitude to be profitable.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial></FONT> </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20 <DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20 title=3DAJAskey@aol.com = href=3D"mailto:AJAskey@aol.com">AJAskey@aol.com</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 06, 2002 8:21 AM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT</DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV><FONT face=3Darial,helvetica><FONT = size=3D2>Katherine,<BR><BR>My=20 thought is the fundies don't make a bit of difference of the first = 10-20% of the=20 move. When "M" is bad very little works no matter what the fundies = are. When "M" is cooking everything works no matter what the = fundies=20 are. CANSLIM attempts to separate those stocks capable of making = the=20 20-1500% move from those that can't.<BR><BR>Many appear to get sucked in = during=20 a good "M" to buying only from a good base. This works fine but it = is=20 tougher to make a reasonable long term return making only 20% on each = positive=20 buy while losing 8% on each negative buy and then staying in cash during = the bad=20 "M". If I were to make 500% during a good bull run I would = have less=20 temptation to try to make up for missing the big moves in a bad "M" when = I only=20 turned several 20% gainers into 100% return during the=20 bull.<BR><BR>Andy<BR><BR>In a message dated 12/5/2002 11:27:03 PM = Central=20 Standard Time, kmalm@earthlink.net writes:<BR><BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px = solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"=20 TYPE=3D"CITE">To Curt's original point, each investor has to find a = meaningful=20 set of rules to follow within a set of style guidelines (in this case, = CANSLIM), trade by them, and then adjust as necessary as they learn = from their=20 post analysis.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR></FONT></FONT></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_006C_01C29D02.E13445F0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Fundamental Philosophies "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): RE: Fundamental Philosophies (was: [CANSLIM] NXTL, SXT) "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]