From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 02:36:41 EST
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro : New List Member "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
pshah:
I don't want to argue the point. This is just how Q appears to me: Yo=
u=20
could be right; however, I think you are wrong. Q is not in a bullish mode.=
=20
Here is why I think that:
Earnings, and even projected '03 Earnings, are negative;=20
There is A LOT of overhead resistance (I believe that both these points=20
support the fact that institutions will not invest in Q. They would have=20
bought Q in the 90's when "Romance" of internet stocks was in full bloom, bu=
t=20
I don't believe they would now. Earnings are what will propel the stock=20
tomorrow, not fanciful notions);=20
One could argue that Q has made a V-shaped cup, but going from about 1 up to=
=20
4=BD is not my idea of a rally (the cup's subsequent trough should be a=20
correction from an immediately preceding rally). To me the chart looks like=
=20
a rally correction of an ongoing downtrend.
I'll never understand (although I probably did it myself) the novice's mad=20
love affair with technical analysis for technical analysis's sake. If=20
something isn't kosher, why acceed to it? For example, you say that the RS=20
has been increasing, gapping up on higher volume and "not violating the gap"=
.=20
I say: Big Deal. This just says that the stock is doing better than the=20
market-so the question becomes why choose this stock over others with better=
=20
and more powerful RS-Lines? =20
Also, what is the connection between your implication that the stock is=
=20
strong because the RS-Line did not violate the gap? In my opinion, the=20
RS-Line is not the stock; the only thing that can be read in the RS-Line is:=
=20
that it is steep, that it is level or that it is plunging.=20
As I said, you could be right and I could be wrong. However, a=20
successful stock picker must not only learn so that he/she can understand=20
chart analysis, but also he/she must be able to view the chart=20
realistically, and understand what is and what is not significant (even=20
though a lot in the chart may actually be relevant).
jans
=20
In a message dated 12/25/2002 1:34:53 AM Eastern Standard Time,=20
pshah@lason.com writes:
<< To me the chart looks very bullish. Ofcourse, I am inexperienced >>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Intro : New List Member "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]