Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research


From: "Tom Worley" <stkguru@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 07:06:08 -0500

Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Hi Pritish,

my comment was based only on the news and fundamentals, compared to how the
stock has behaved recently. The FCC already approved their entry into long
distance service, so that is already priced in (and may be part of the
reason for the rally, in expectation that it could lead to reduced losses
and eventual profits). Likewise, the news of accounting irregularities, and
the restatement of $1.5 billion in revenues and costs is known, as is the
continuing SEC investigation. The specific news that caught my curiosity was
S&P downgrading their bonds to "selective default", combined with their
plans to issue more bonds at higher interest rates in an attempt to reduce
their debt load by $1.9 billion. So while their total debt may decrease, the
cost of servicing that debt may not reduce proportionately due the higher
interest rates on the new bonds.  With revenues decreasing, and losses
increasing, it looked to me like the rally to nearly $6 was overdone, and if
actual default occurred, it could lead to bankruptcy and a stock price
approaching zero.

Add to that the costs and distractions associated with the shareholder
lawsuits over the accounting irregularities, and its not a pretty picture to
me. But I have not done in depth due diligence, nor am likely to do so or
short it. Was just curious if anyone else out there was following it closer.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Pritish Shah" <pshah@lason.com>
To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 1:31 AM
Subject: [CANSLIM] Qwest research



Tom,

It seems that this went through a cup and a handle pattern. The base
seems 6-7 months long though it has been sloppy. The RS has been
increasing. It gapped up on heavy volume and did not violate that gap.
The volume dried up in the base while forming the right side of the
cup.

Maybe finally the USWest purchase may be paying off. Plus, isn't the
FCC supposed to rule on the long-distance offering  by the bells?

To me the chart looks very bullish. Ofcourse, I am inexperienced. Can
you tell us why you feel that this could be a short candidate?

http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=Q,uu[w,a]daclyyay[pb50!b200][vc6
0][iUb14!La12,26,9]&pref=G

Regards,
Pritish

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [CANSLIM] Qwest research Spencer48@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Qwest research "Pritish Shah"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.