Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 20:21:58 EST

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Chazmoore@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

Mike: 

     So true.  And well put.  
     And I'd add this appended equation:  Capitalism + Competition = Benefit 
to the Consumer (like a painting capitalism + competition ='s more than the 
sum of its parts)

jans


In a message dated 12/30/2002 8:02:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
mike@proactech.com writes:

<< Without getting into the controversy over the cost of eIBD, there seems to 
be a fundamental belief displayed here that I think is
 mistaken. That is that the cost to the consumer should bear some 
relationship to the cost of production and distribution. In fact
 there is no such relationship under our capitalist system. Consumers will be 
willing to pay whatever price matches the percieved
 utility of the service offered. In general, speed, convenience and 
uniqueness command a premium. The marketplace will be the judge. >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.