Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD


From: AJAskey@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 17:10:52 EST

Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Is the market ready to rally? "Fred Richards"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Daily S&P 500 prices for the past 20 years? Gene Ricci
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- --part1_129.1eeda021.2b436fec_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Here are my thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe but has 
since cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is what you 
meant).  

First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to worry someone 
who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull market.  (For those 
playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the gains.)  There is a 
question about whether it is useful to pay for DGO in a mega-bear market when 
CANSLIM is the method of investing.  It may be better to subscribe on a 
monthly basis and only pay when the market could be ready to pick up and 
cancel when it is obvious by the charts that it will take a few months for a 
CANSLIM market to being.  The IBD paper is different and I like that in both 
bull and bear markets.

OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in theory, I do 
think the current content makes it worth about $100-$250 per year.  The 
charts are free several places.  The majority data provided can be found for 
free or around $250 per year from other sources.  These data source also 
provide the raw data behind the DGO data for download to a local computer.  
DGO shows the EPS and sales that make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, but does not 
provide a method of allowing that data to be downloaded.  I understand the 
concept of proprietary data but DGO does not have data that isn't available 
elsewhere for much less.  With the data on the computer a user can screen for 
CANSLIM criteria to find potential candidates.  The rankings can be found in 
an IBD or a subscriber can find then online.

As for the eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB.  This is too 
much to download everyday and several people I know who subscribed to eIBD 
have cancelled because it is just too much trouble.

Andy

In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, 
smaye1211@yahoo.com writes:


> Just a question to anybody out there what do you think a fair price should 
> be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers) 
> 
> 


- --part1_129.1eeda021.2b436fec_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<HTML><FONT FACE=arial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=2>Here are my thoughts on the cost of DGO as someone who did subscribe but has since cancelled. (You mentioned DGO with eIBD and I hope that is what you meant).&nbsp; <BR>
<BR>
First, I think that the dollar cost is not that expensive to worry someone who is investing at least $5000 in stocks in a bull market.&nbsp; (For those playing with $2000 it may turn out to eat up all the gains.)&nbsp; There is a question about whether it is useful to pay for DGO in a mega-bear market when CANSLIM is the method of investing.&nbsp; It may be better to subscribe on a monthly basis and only pay when the market could be ready to pick up and cancel when it is obvious by the charts that it will take a few months for a CANSLIM market to being.&nbsp; The IBD paper is different and I like that in both bull and bear markets.<BR>
<BR>
OTOH -- Even though I don't think DGO is overly expensive in theory, I do think the current content makes it worth about $100-$250 per year.&nbsp; The charts are free several places.&nbsp; The majority data provided can be found for free or around $250 per year from other sources.&nbsp; These data source also provide the raw data behind the DGO data for download to a local computer.&nbsp; DGO shows the EPS and sales that make up the Q/Q and Y/Y growth, but does not provide a method of allowing that data to be downloaded.&nbsp; I understand the concept of proprietary data but DGO does not have data that isn't available elsewhere for much less.&nbsp; With the data on the computer a user can screen for CANSLIM criteria to find potential candidates.&nbsp; The rankings can be found in an IBD or a subscriber can find then online.<BR>
<BR>
As for the eIBD, I looked at a sample online that was over 5MB.&nbsp; This is too much to download everyday and several people I know who subscribed to eIBD have cancelled because it is just too much trouble.<BR>
<BR>
Andy<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 12/31/2002 1:51:17 PM Central Standard Time, smaye1211@yahoo.com writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">Just a question to anybody out there what do you think a fair price should be for DGO online (I'm not one of IBD lurkers) <BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_129.1eeda021.2b436fec_boundary--




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] Is the market ready to rally? "Fred Richards"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Daily S&P 500 prices for the past 20 years? Gene Ricci
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] eIBD "Ann"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.