Re: [CANSLIM] hitk


From: "NANCY POLCARO" <ZILLAGIRL@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] hitk
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:22:32 -0800

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] hitk BIKEAR@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] float? "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] hitk "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] hitk BIKEAR@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C2C7A1.DCD369E0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would like to also ask if anyone knows a site where it show the buys an=
d sells for the day and/or the block trades. Thanks for any info nancy

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Spencer48@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 2:06 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] hitk

Katherine: =20

     Very nice chart analysis of HITK.  Notice that on DGO, HITK's daily =20
RS-line is up at the recent troughs in January.  This led me to believe t=
hat =20
it was strong (as a matter of fact, I categorized its RS-line as being in=
 =20
Strong Divergence).  This, in turn, led me to believe that this was a =20
worthwhile stock to buy (assuming the market turned up) on its Break Out.=
  =20

     However, your chart's downtrend in the Up/Down ratio since October/0=
2 =20
has given me pause.  Moreover, HITK's Weekly shows that it is way =20
overextended (when it broke out in Sept. at 9 [it is now at around 19]), =
so =20
perhaps this means that HITK is in a temporary top, and that its Weekly i=
s =20
reflecting its Up/Down trend-decline .  (But notice that even now, the we=
ekly =20
RS-line shows a lot of strength in its steepness and the RS-line's strong=
 =20
divergence at the top compared to a few weeks earlier).

     As I mentioned, HITK looked strong to me also, until you noted (in t=
he =20
chart) its declining Up/Down ratio.  Is there a database on-line where I =
can =20
gather this past information on the Up/Down Ratio (and Accum/Distribution=
 =20
Ratings also, if possible?)

jans

In a message dated 1/29/2003 12:04:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, =20
kmalm@earthlink.net writes:

<< HITK is not currently in a definable base, and so doesn't yet provide =
a =20
clear
entry point. See my annotated chart at:

http://www.cwhcharts.com/katherine/HITK012903.JPG

Katherine >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C2C7A1.DCD369E0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><BODY STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;"><DIV>I would like t=
o also ask if anyone knows a site where it show the buys and sells for th=
e day and/or the block trades. Thanks for any info nancy</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp=
;</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGI=
N-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV sty=
le=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"=
BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> Spencer=
48@aol.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, =
January 29, 2003 2:06 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B>=
 canslim@lists.xmission.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subj=
ect:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] hitk</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>Katherine: <BR><BR>&nb=
sp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Very nice chart analysis of HITK.&nbsp; Notice that=
 on DGO, HITK's daily <BR>RS-line is up at the recent troughs in January.=
&nbsp; This led me to believe that <BR>it was strong (as a matter of fact=
, I categorized its RS-line as being in <BR>Strong Divergence).&nbsp; Thi=
s, in turn, led me to believe that this was a <BR>worthwhile stock to buy=
 (assuming the market turned up) on its Break Out.&nbsp; <BR><BR>&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; However, your chart's downtrend in the Up/Down ratio sin=
ce October/02 <BR>has given me pause.&nbsp; Moreover, HITK's Weekly shows=
 that it is way <BR>overextended (when it broke out in Sept. at 9 [it is =
now at around 19]), so <BR>perhaps this means that HITK is in a temporary=
 top, and that its Weekly is <BR>reflecting its Up/Down trend-decline .&n=
bsp; (But notice that even now, the weekly <BR>RS-line shows a lot of str=
ength in its steepness and the RS-line's strong <BR>divergence at the top=
 compared to a few weeks earlier).<BR><BR>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; As I m=
entioned, HITK looked strong to me also, until you noted (in the <BR>char=
t) its declining Up/Down ratio.&nbsp; Is there a database on-line where I=
 can <BR>gather this past information on the Up/Down Ratio (and Accum/Dis=
tribution <BR>Ratings also, if possible?)<BR><BR>jans<BR><BR>In a message=
 dated 1/29/2003 12:04:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, <BR>kmalm@earthlink.n=
et writes:<BR><BR>&lt;&lt; HITK is not currently in a definable base, and=
 so doesn't yet provide a <BR>clear<BR>entry point. See my annotated char=
t at:<BR><BR>http://www.cwhcharts.com/katherine/HITK012903.JPG<BR><BR>Kat=
herine &gt;&gt;<BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@x=
mission.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"uns=
ubscribe canslim".&nbsp; Do not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE=
></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_001_0002_01C2C7A1.DCD369E0--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] hitk BIKEAR@aol.com
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] float? "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] hitk "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] hitk BIKEAR@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.