From: Gene Ricci <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?)
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 20:19:02 -0600
Next Article (by Author): RE: Rankings (was: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?)) "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) Roger Tawa
Next in Thread: Re: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C2CFAF.520D3960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Patrick, totally agree. The ease of getting the data and ranking from = QuotesPlus just about makes their data better than IBD/DGO to say = nothing about the significant cost savings. Gene=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Patrick Wahl=20 To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20 Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 8:10 PM Subject: RE: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) I think others here have a different opinion on this matter, but to me = things=20 don't have to match exactly. I have used Quotes Plus, and found their = EPS and RS rankings fine, although they are not the same as IBD. The=20 underlying idea to these ratings is to find the stocks that are = growing=20 earnings at a good rate and whose stock price is performing well. = Then a=20 buy decision is made based on a few other factors, such as chart = pattern. =20 I think these alternate ratings allow one to home in the usual growth = stocks=20 just as well as the IBD services. On 8 Feb 2003 at 20:41, Roger Tawa wrote: > How important is it for the rank to match ibd's definitions exactly? = Isn't > anyone's calculation of a rank as relevant as another's? there are = quite a few > websites that say they calculate these values. how important is it = that msn's > calculations "are not weighted as they are at IBD/DGO, so don't give = quite the > same info"? - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C2CFAF.520D3960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Patrick, totally agree. The ease of = getting the=20 data and ranking from QuotesPlus just about makes their data better than = IBD/DGO=20 to say nothing about the significant cost savings.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Gene</FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV> <DIV=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: = black"><B>From:</B>=20 <A title=3Dpjwahl@attbi.com href=3D"mailto:pjwahl@attbi.com">Patrick = Wahl</A>=20 </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A = title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20 = href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>= </DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, February 08, = 2003 8:10=20 PM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: POSS (was: = [CANSLIM] where=20 is everybody?)</DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV>I think others here have a different opinion on this = matter,=20 but to me things <BR>don't have to match exactly. I have used = Quotes=20 Plus, and found their <BR>EPS and RS rankings fine, although they are = not the=20 same as IBD. The <BR>underlying idea to these ratings is to find = the=20 stocks that are growing <BR>earnings at a good rate and whose stock = price is=20 performing well. Then a <BR>buy decision is made based on a few = other=20 factors, such as chart pattern. <BR>I think these alternate = ratings=20 allow one to home in the usual growth stocks <BR>just as well as the = IBD=20 services.<BR><BR>On 8 Feb 2003 at 20:41, Roger Tawa wrote:<BR><BR>> = How=20 important is it for the rank to match ibd's definitions exactly? = Isn't<BR>> anyone's calculation of a rank as relevant as = another's? =20 there are quite a few<BR>> websites that say they calculate these=20 values. how important is it that msn's<BR>> calculations "are = not=20 weighted as they are at IBD/DGO, so don't give quite the<BR>> same=20 info"?<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In= the=20 email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe = canslim". Do=20 not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_0030_01C2CFAF.520D3960-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): RE: Rankings (was: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?)) "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) Roger Tawa
Next in Thread: Re: POSS (was: [CANSLIM] where is everybody?) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]