Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "NANCY POLCARO" <ZILLAGIRL@msn.com>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:15:00 -0800
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] OPTC Ian
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C2DD7F.EB99B760
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Tom- that's kind of what I was looking for- the things that don't=
make it canslim-I see that now that you pointed it out. Also thanks to G=
ene for spending the time to look up more facts for me. Some people stil=
l are trying to learn on this board-appreciate you guys trying to help us=
. zilla
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Tom Worley
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 3:50 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
and it made my short list in WWW last weekend for its high handle on the =
cup
- ----- Original Message ----- =20
From: inderjit =20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com =20
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:42 PM
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
Perfect pick. Heading in the right direction. Even Tom W rated this very =
high approximately 3 years ago=E2=80=A6.
=20
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmissi=
on.com] On Behalf Of NANCY POLCARO
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:44 PM
To: canslim
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
=20
wondering if anyone has thoughts on yahoo-numbers in paper look good and =
possible break out?? PE of 109 . would appreciate some thoughts on this=
one as far as CANSLIM-thanks nancy
=20
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Katherine Malm
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:09 AM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
=20
Hi jans & Mike,
jans... I understand Mike's question and believe he wasn't asking for
personal details and I have to admit I've asked similar questions of folk=
s
here in the group. Namely, "how has the experience of the last few years
changed the way you trade?" I've also posted my own point of view on thin=
gs
CANSLIM in the past, so I won't go into great details, but will instead j=
ust
give a quick overview of what I've been doing the last few years.
(1) No, I've not spent the entire time in cash. In April 2000 I started
shorting the market on downtrends. That's an aggressive strategy that
compliments a CANSLIM long strategy, but is decidedly not CANSLIM. Howeve=
r,
I kept things simple by shorting stocks in the former CANSLIM camp. That =
is,
stocks that were rolling over; stocks that rolled over, rose and then
started to fail again; etc. It's been an excellent learning experience, b=
ut
I have to say it was a lot easier to short in 2000-2001 than it has been =
in
the last 6 months. When there are no clear signals in either direction, I=
'll
stay in cash. I don't feel a need to trade all the time. My goal is to ma=
ke
money, not trade to make my day interesting.
(2) I still use CANSLIM for long strategies and I'm about as purist as on=
e
can get with it. The major exception that I make is that WON suggests tha=
t a
stock rise at least 25-30% from a previous base and be in an underlying
uptrend before entering a breakout. The longer the Bear goes on, the less
likely it is that one can find potential long positions meeting that
condition. For the purist of the pure CANSLIMers, that would be enough to
keep one primarily in cash for most of the last 3 years. However, WON als=
o
suggests that once a stock's old highs are more than 1 to 1-1/2 years awa=
y,
the less the old high applies to current trading conditions. That means o=
ne
has to be alert to what I refer to as "bottoming bases." If all other
conditions are met technically (RS, relationship to 200dMA, pattern, etc.=
)
and the fundamentals (especially turnaround conditions) are met, then it
becomes a viable candidate.
These are the primary CANSLIM issues that I've focused my attention on in
the last few years:
(1) Rising strength is more important than "top of the heap." This means
that bottoms up stock picking is far more effective than top down. While
industry strength matters, it should never be the first stop in a selecti=
on
process, rather an indicator of the direction of the move and the potenti=
al
strength of an impending breakout (or breakdown).
(2) Reading and re-reading WON has clearly indicated that fundamentals
should be considered on the preponderance of evidence. Despite the 20 rul=
es
of investing in the IBD, there are many exceptions to the >=3D25% growth,=
etc.
and WON has always laid them on the table as if/thens. Overly restrictive
fundamental searches leave out some of the very best candidates.
(3) Technicals first, fundamentals second. Both matter, but technicals le=
ad
the eye to rising strength. The better one is at reading price/volume act=
ion
and technicals in general, the more they can rely on them for stock
selection and entry/exit. I rely more on the technical action of the stoc=
k
to tell me when to enter/exit. That means that the "8%" rule is generally
the last to kick in. I have a mental stop going into the trade that is se=
t
based on the technical action of the stock. Sometimes that is 4%, sometim=
es
it's 10%. It depends on the market and the stock itself.
(4) Disicipline and methodical, unemotional rule-based trading is the key=
to
consistent profits.
This approach works in all markets--trending or sideways.
I'd be interested in what others have learned in the last few years and h=
ope
folks will chime in with their personal observations/learning points as
well.
Katherine
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com
[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Spencer48@aol.com
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 5:00 PM
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM
Mike:
I love it when people speak for me: It's so interesting to hear
another
person's voice attached to my apparent words.
I agree with the latter portion of your E-mail (being grateful to
Katherine for all her work and analyses), but I don't agree with the form=
er
(asking Katherine to tell us, in general, how she's been trading the last
couple of years).
At any rate, I believe such a query intrudes on personal matters
(financially speaking), and is sort of like asking someone to explain
oneself
(ie. putting Katherine on the defensive).
My point is: I don't mind the query-it's really not directed at me,
and
Katherine can answer it or not as she chooses. But I do mind someone whe=
n
someone says that he's speaking for me. And especially so when he fashio=
ns
his E-mail to make it appear that I agree with all he is saying.
jans
In a message dated 2/24/2003 11:58:49 AM Eastern Standard Time,
michael_niemotka@baxter.com writes:
<< Katherine, would you be willing to share with the group the "general"
type
of trading that you have been doing over the past couple of years, given
the "M"?
Have you spent the last couple years in mostly cash, or have you done som=
e
trading, and if so, how have you modified CANSLIM? Have you taken profits
much more quickly, ie at 10-20%, rather than risk a ride for higher gains=
?
Tightening the 8% loss rule to 5%?
I am not expecting details, but I think I speak for the group when I say
that we all value your insight into the application of CANSLIM.
Thanks
Mike
>>
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C2DD7F.EB99B760
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#ffffff" STYLE=3D"font:10pt verdana; border:none;b=
ackground-color:#ffffff; "><DIV>Thanks Tom- that's kind of what I was loo=
king for- the things that don't make it canslim-I see that now that=
you pointed it out. Also thanks to Gene for spending the time to look up=
more facts for me. Some people still are trying to learn on this b=
oard-appreciate you guys trying to help us. zilla</DIV> <DIV> =
</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN=
- -LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV styl=
e=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message -----</DIV> <DIV style=3D"B=
ACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: black"><B>From:</B> Tom Worl=
ey</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, February=
26, 2003 3:50 AM</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> cansli=
m@lists.xmission.com</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B=
> Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM</DIV> <D=
IV> </DIV> <META content=3DWord.Document name=3DProgId> <META conten=
t=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=3DGENERATOR> <META content=3D"Microsoft =
Word 10" name=3DOriginator><LINK href=3D"cid:filelist.xml@01C2DD27.8BDD3B=
B0" rel=3DFile-List><?xml:namespace prefix =3D o ns =3D "urn:schemas-micr=
osoft-com:office:office" /><o:SmartTagType namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-mi=
crosoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"time"></o:SmartTagType><o:SmartTagT=
ype namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" name=3D"d=
ate"></o:SmartTagType> <STYLE>st1\:* { BEHAVIOR: url(#default#ieooui) } =
</STYLE> <STYLE> <!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:=
"MS Mincho"; panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4; mso-font-alt:"\FF2D\FF33 \66=
0E\671D"; mso-font-charset:128; mso-generic-font-family:modern; mso-fo=
nt-pitch:fixed; mso-font-signature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;=
} @font-face {font-family:Tahoma; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-f=
ont-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; =
mso-font-signature:553679495 -2147483648 8 0 66047 0;} @font-face {font=
- -family:"\@MS Mincho"; panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4; mso-font-charset:1=
28; mso-generic-font-family:modern; mso-font-pitch:fixed; mso-font-sig=
nature:-1610612033 1757936891 16 0 131231 0;} @font-face {font-family:Ve=
rdana; panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-=
font-family:swiss; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:53687155=
9 0 0 0 415 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.=
MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:""; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; ms=
o-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Times New Rom=
an"; mso-fareast-font-family:"MS Mincho";} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {c=
olor:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited=
, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline; =
text-underline:single;} span.EmailStyle17 {mso-style-type:personal-reply=
; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:=
10.0pt; font-family:Arial; mso-ascii-font-family:Arial; mso-hansi-font=
- -family:Arial; mso-bidi-font-family:Arial; color:navy;} @page Section1 =
{size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margi=
n:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {pag=
e:Section1;} --> </STYLE> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial>and it made my short l=
ist in WWW last weekend for its high handle on the cup</FONT></DIV> <DIV>=
</DIV> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A t=
itle=3Dinderjit@adelphia.net href=3D"mailto:inderjit@adelphia.net">inderj=
it</A> </DIV> <DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com href=3D=
"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> </DIV>=
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:42 PM</DIV> <DIV><B>Subj=
ect:</B> RE: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM</=
DIV></DIV> <DIV><BR></DIV> <DIV class=3DSection1> <P class=3DMsoNormal><F=
ONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Ar=
ial">Perfect pick. Heading in the right direction. Even Tom W rated this =
very high approximately 3 years ago=E2=80=A6.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P=
> <P class=3DMsoNormal><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dnavy size=3D2><SPAN sty=
le=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><o:p> </o:p>=
</SPAN></FONT></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FON=
T face=3DTahoma size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tah=
oma">-----Original Message-----<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">F=
rom:</SPAN></B> <A href=3D"mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com">owner=
- -canslim@lists.xmission.com</A> [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]=
<B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">On Behalf Of </SPAN></B>NANCY POLCA=
RO<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Tuesday, Febr=
uary 25, 2003 9:44 PM<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN><=
/B> canslim<BR><B><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> R=
e: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM</SPAN></FON=
T></P> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=3D"Ti=
mes New Roman" size=3D3><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><o:p> </o:p>=
</SPAN></FONT></P> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in=
"><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMI=
LY: Verdana">wondering if anyone has thoughts on yahoo-numbers in paper l=
ook good and possible break out?? PE of 109 . would appreciat=
e some thoughts on this one as far as CANSLIM-thanks nancy<o:p></o:=
p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEF=
T: 0.5in"><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; F=
ONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <BLOCKQUOT=
E style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: med=
ium none; PADDING-LEFT: 4pt; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; MARGIN: 5pt 0in 5pt 3.7=
5pt; BORDER-LEFT: black 1.5pt solid; PADDING-TOP: 0in; BORDER-BOTTOM: med=
ium none"> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"=
>----- Original Message -----<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <DIV> <P=
class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><B><=
FONT face=3DArial color=3Dblack size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold=
; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">From:</SPAN></FONT><=
/B><FONT face=3DArial color=3Dblack size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10=
pt; COLOR: black; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> Katherine Malm<o:p></o:p></SPAN></=
FONT></P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><=
B><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE=
: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Sent:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=3DArial siz=
e=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> Tuesday, Febru=
ary 25, 2003 10:09 AM<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3D=
MsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><B><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SP=
AN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">To:</=
SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10p=
t; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> canslim@lists.xmission.com<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FON=
T></P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><B><=
FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 1=
0pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Subject:</SPAN></FONT></B><FONT face=3DArial siz=
e=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Arial"> RE: [CANSLIM] =
CANSLIM Hunting List 02/21/03 + Notes on CANSLIM<o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT>=
</P></DIV> <DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT =
face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verd=
ana"> <o:p></o:p></SPAN></FONT></P></DIV> <P class=3DMsoNormal style=
=3D"MARGIN-LEFT: 0.5in"><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT=
- -SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Hi jans & Mike,<BR><BR>jans... I u=
nderstand Mike's question and believe he wasn't asking for<BR>personal de=
tails and I have to admit I've asked similar questions of folks<BR>here i=
n the group. Namely, "how has the experience of the last few years<BR>cha=
nged the way you trade?" I've also posted my own point of view on things<=
BR>CANSLIM in the past, so I won't go into great details, but will instea=
d just<BR>give a quick overview of what I've been doing the last few year=
s.<BR><BR>(1) No, I've not spent the entire time in cash. In April 2000 I=
started<BR>shorting the market on downtrends. That's an aggressive strat=
egy that<BR>compliments a CANSLIM long strategy, but is decidedly not CAN=
SLIM. However,<BR>I kept things simple by shorting stocks in the former C=
ANSLIM camp. That is,<BR>stocks that were rolling over; stocks that rolle=
d over, rose and then<BR>started to fail again; etc. It's been an excelle=
nt learning experience, but<BR>I have to say it was a lot easier to short=
in 2000-2001 than it has been in<BR>the last 6 months. When there are no=
clear signals in either direction, I'll<BR>stay in cash. I don't feel a =
need to trade all the time. My goal is to make<BR>money, not trade to mak=
e my day interesting.<BR><BR>(2) I still use CANSLIM for long strategies =
and I'm about as purist as one<BR>can get with it. The major exception th=
at I make is that WON suggests that a<BR>stock rise at least 25-30% from =
a previous base and be in an underlying<BR>uptrend before entering a brea=
kout. The longer the Bear goes on, the less<BR>likely it is that one can =
find potential long positions meeting that<BR>condition. For the purist o=
f the pure CANSLIMers, that would be enough to<BR>keep one primarily in c=
ash for most of the last 3 years. However, WON also<BR>suggests that once=
a stock's old highs are more than 1 to 1-1/2 years away,<BR>the less the=
old high applies to current trading conditions. That means one<BR>has to=
be alert to what I refer to as "bottoming bases." If all other<BR>condit=
ions are met technically (RS, relationship to 200dMA, pattern, etc.)<BR>a=
nd the fundamentals (especially turnaround conditions) are met, then it<B=
R>becomes a viable candidate.<BR><BR>These are the primary CANSLIM issues=
that I've focused my attention on in<BR>the last few years:<BR>(1) Risin=
g strength is more important than "top of the heap." This means<BR>that b=
ottoms up stock picking is far more effective than top down. While<BR>ind=
ustry strength matters, it should never be the first stop in a selection<=
BR>process, rather an indicator of the direction of the move and the pote=
ntial<BR>strength of an impending breakout (or breakdown).<BR>(2) Reading=
and re-reading WON has clearly indicated that fundamentals<BR>should be =
considered on the preponderance of evidence. Despite the 20 rules<BR>of i=
nvesting in the IBD, there are many exceptions to the >=3D25% growth, =
etc.<BR>and WON has always laid them on the table as if/thens. Overly res=
trictive<BR>fundamental searches leave out some of the very best candidat=
es.<BR>(3) Technicals first, fundamentals second. Both matter, but techni=
cals lead<BR>the eye to rising strength. The better one is at reading pri=
ce/volume action<BR>and technicals in general, the more they can rely on =
them for stock<BR>selection and entry/exit. I rely more on the technical =
action of the stock<BR>to tell me when to enter/exit. That means that the=
"8%" rule is generally<BR>the last to kick in. I have a mental stop goin=
g into the trade that is set<BR>based on the technical action of the stoc=
k. Sometimes that is 4%, sometimes<BR>it's 10%. It depends on the market =
and the stock itself.<BR>(4) Disicipline and methodical, unemotional rule=
- -based trading is the key to<BR>consistent profits.<BR><BR>This approach =
works in all markets--trending or sideways.<BR><BR>I'd be interested in w=
hat others have learned in the last few years and hope<BR>folks will chim=
e in with their personal observations/learning points as<BR>well.<BR><BR>=
Katherine<BR><BR>-----Original Message-----<BR>From: owner-canslim@lists.=
xmission.com<BR>[mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Spe=
ncer48@aol.com<BR>Sent: </SPAN></FONT><?xml:namespace prefix =3D st1 ns =3D=
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:date Month=3D"2" Day=
=3D"24" Year=3D"2003"><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-S=
IZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">Monday, February 24, 2003</SPAN></FONT><=
/st1:date><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; F=
ONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> </SPAN></FONT><st1:time Hour=3D"17" Minute=3D"0"><F=
ONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: =
Verdana">5:00 PM</SPAN></FONT></st1:time><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><S=
PAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"><BR>To: canslim@lists=
.xmission.com<BR>Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] CANSLIM Hunting List </SPAN></FON=
T><st1:date Month=3D"2" Day=3D"21" Year=3D"2003"><FONT face=3DVerdana siz=
e=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana">02/21/03</SPA=
N></FONT></st1:date><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2><SPAN style=3D"FONT-SIZ=
E: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"> + Notes on CANSLIM<BR><BR><BR>Mike:<BR><B=
R> I love it when people speak for me: It's=
so interesting to hear<BR>another<BR>person's voice attached to my appar=
ent words.<BR><BR> I agree with the latter =
portion of your E-mail (being grateful to<BR>Katherine for all her work a=
nd analyses), but I don't agree with the former<BR>(asking Katherine to t=
ell us, in general, how she's been trading the last<BR>couple of years).<=
BR><BR> At any rate, I believe such a query intru=
des on personal matters<BR>(financially speaking), and is sort of like as=
king someone to explain<BR>oneself<BR>(ie. putting Katherine on the defen=
sive).<BR><BR> My point is: I don't mind th=
e query-it's really not directed at me,<BR>and<BR>Katherine can answer it=
or not as she chooses. But I do mind someone when<BR>someone says =
that he's speaking for me. And especially so when he fashions<BR>hi=
s E-mail to make it appear that I agree with all he is saying.<BR><BR>jan=
s<BR><BR><BR>In a message dated 2/24/2003 11:58:49 AM Eastern Standard Ti=
me,<BR>michael_niemotka@baxter.com writes:<BR><BR><< Katherine, wou=
ld you be willing to share with the group the "general"<BR>type<BR>of tra=
ding that you have been doing over the past couple of years, given<BR>the=
"M"?<BR><BR>Have you spent the last couple years in mostly cash, or have=
you done some<BR>trading, and if so, how have you modified CANSLIM? Have=
you taken profits<BR>much more quickly, ie at 10-20%, rather than risk a=
ride for higher gains?<BR>Tightening the 8% loss rule to 5%?<BR><BR>I am=
not expecting details, but I think I speak for the group when I say<BR>t=
hat we all value your insight into the application of CANSLIM.<BR><BR>Tha=
nks<BR><BR>Mike<BR> >><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe,=
email "majordomo@xmission.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscribe c=
anslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your ema=
il.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmiss=
ion.com"<BR>-In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubsc=
ribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.<o:p></o:p></SPAN></=
FONT></P></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
- ------=_NextPart_001_0000_01C2DD7F.EB99B760--
- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] OPTC Ian
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]