Re: [CANSLIM] AMI

From: Spencer48@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] AMI
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:52:32 EST

Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] AMI "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] AMI "rchodes"
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] AMI "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

rc:

     AMI does look as if it has broken out of a flat base that had extended 
back to June/02.  And its funamentals look nice also.  The number of funds 
that have bought it has nearly quintupled in the last 9 months.

     What I don't understand, though, is:  1) With the stock doing as well as 
it is, why does DGO rate its "timeliness" as merely a "C".  2) DGO says that 
management owns only 4% of the stock.  But the float is only about 20% of the 
stock outstanding.  So who owns this 80+% if not the mgt.?  
     Tom!  Any ideas?

jans


In a message dated 2/27/2003 7:39:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
rchodes@charter.net writes:

<< Breakouts are hard to find these days by AMI is doing well.  A little 
extended right now.  I don't own this stock but I do have APPX.  >>

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.