From: James Lackey <lackey1967@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Does CANSLIM Work? (was Re: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:05:16 -0800 (PST)
Next Article (by Date): Re: Does CANSLIM Work? (was Re: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_=5BCANSLIM=5D_Re:_=5BCANSLIM=5D_Intro:_S=E9bastien_Der?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ks?= jclark249@comcast.net
Next in Thread: Re: Does CANSLIM Work? (was Re: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Tom, very nice testemonial. I appreciate your experience in the markets. I have much to learn. Would you please be very specific in how canslim works? I try to take a scientific approach to the markets. Is there anything that you guys have backtested? Regrettably I have lost millions to my brokers daytrading. I can't afford to trade systems unless the are an edge. LACK - --- Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net> wrote: > James, I snipped off the rest of your post, as it didn't apply to the > question you ask. > > Does CANSLIM work? I say yes, at least for me, my style, my application, > and > directly in proportion to my diligence, time available, discipline in > sticking to what I have found works for me. > > That said, with over 15 years of full time involvement in the securities > industry, and an active investor throughout that time, plus another 30 > years > of limited investing and activity, I find that CANSLIM makes the most > sense > to me of all systems I have studied and tried. Have I tried all of them? > Of > course not, but I have at least dabbled over the years in most that have > been around for more than a year or two. > > CANSLIM has survived the test of time. People still use it, and new people > still want to learn about it. That alone means it is successful on some > level. And because I am not the only one that has been using it > consistently > (according to my own style, interpretation, and all the other caveats) for > well over a decade straight and still believe in it, I must conclude that > it > is successful for at least some investors. > > That fact that this board, dedicated to learning about CANSLIM, is still > around after over 7 years, and still has a number of the original members, > says a lot about the success of CANSLIM. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Lackey" <lackey1967@yahoo.com> > To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com> > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:16 PM > Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks > > > Does anyone have any statistics that verify that canslim works? The > problem > I see is that it can not be broken down into a falseafiable hypothesis. > Thank you LACK > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: Does CANSLIM Work? (was Re: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks) "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_=5BCANSLIM=5D_Re:_=5BCANSLIM=5D_Intro:_S=E9bastien_Der?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?ks?= jclark249@comcast.net
Next in Thread: Re: Does CANSLIM Work? (was Re: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks) "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]