Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.From: "inderjit" <inderjit@adelphia.net>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] Numbers, was PRAA - Opinions
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 16:18:40 -0500
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks Harold Josephson
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
None of the companies can have good MANSLlC numbers :-( You got the idea! - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Erik Harris Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 2:25 PM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] PRAA - Opinions Hi, I was just wondering if I could get other views of PRAA? It seems to have fairly good CANSLIM numbers. On the negative side, they have higher debt than I would normally accept, however, they are a debt collection company so I'm not sure how to view this piece of data. Other negatives: Sponsorship is low which could be good or bad. Group RS is also Low. The company is a recent IPO and could be volitile. Any opinions are appreciated. Erik - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Stock screening criteria for value stocks Harold Josephson
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]