Re: [CANSLIM] M


From: Gene Ricci <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 15:33:56 -0600

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] M "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] M "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M Marc Deiter
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2E7E3.A0E945F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Tom, thanks for your insight. I attended a small seminar by
Rittenhouse and they showed how well the market did after
wars. I plan to forward it as soon as I get it. Bottom line, their
data showed that being in the market (post war) ... was good!

Gene
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Tom Worley=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 2:28 PM
  Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] M


  Ian,

  My impression of the past weeks is that buyers are disappearing. So I =
would
  read those up days as meaning sellers were not as motivated due =
external
  reasons (no bad economic reports, some lessening in the immediacy of =
war
  with Iraq, etc.). The down days therefore appear to me to be days when =
the
  sellers were more motivated to sell, and buyers were still absent.

  I do find it encouraging that so far the sellers, even with the =
absence of
  significant buying, have not done more damage to the indexes.

  Best parallel I can suggest would be to study the indexes during the =
months
  leading up to Desert Storm beginning (mid Jan 1991 when the air war =
phase
  was launched)

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Ian" <ianstm@shaw.ca>
  To: <canslim@lists.xmission.com>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:38 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] M


  Hi all:

  I was just looking at a chart of QQQ (NASDAQ-100) and noticed an odd
  pattern:

  Over the last 3 weeks (Since Feb 18 - 16 trading days) the QQQ's have =
had 6
  days of increasing, above-average volume. On each of these 6 days, the =
index
  went up. On nine of the ten days of declining, below-average volume, =
the
  index went down.

  Overall, the QQQ is down about 5% (from 25.25 to 24) over those 16 =
days.

  Does anyone recognize this pattern and know if there are historical
  precedents for the likely direction from here? Dp all these volume =
days with
  no 'breakout' forward progress indicate distribution?

  Thanks,

  Ian



  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.



  -
  -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
  -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
  -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2E7E3.A0E945F0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4916.2300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Tom, thanks for your insight. I =
attended a small=20
seminar by</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Rittenhouse and they showed how well =
the market=20
did after</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">wars. I plan to forward it as soon as =
I get it.=20
Bottom line, their</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">data showed that being in the market =
(post war)=20
... was good!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Gene</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dstkguru@bellsouth.net =
href=3D"mailto:stkguru@bellsouth.net">Tom=20
  Worley</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, March 11, 2003 =
2:28=20
  PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] M</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>Ian,<BR><BR>My impression of the past weeks is that =
buyers are=20
  disappearing. So I would<BR>read those up days as meaning sellers were =
not as=20
  motivated due external<BR>reasons (no bad economic reports, some =
lessening in=20
  the immediacy of war<BR>with Iraq, etc.). The down days therefore =
appear to me=20
  to be days when the<BR>sellers were more motivated to sell, and buyers =
were=20
  still absent.<BR><BR>I do find it encouraging that so far the sellers, =
even=20
  with the absence of<BR>significant buying, have not done more damage =
to the=20
  indexes.<BR><BR>Best parallel I can suggest would be to study the =
indexes=20
  during the months<BR>leading up to Desert Storm beginning (mid Jan =
1991 when=20
  the air war phase<BR>was launched)<BR><BR>----- Original Message=20
  -----<BR>From: "Ian" &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:ianstm@shaw.ca">ianstm@shaw.ca</A>&gt;<BR>To: &lt;<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
&gt;<BR>Sent:=20
  Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:38 PM<BR>Subject: [CANSLIM] M<BR><BR><BR>Hi=20
  all:<BR><BR>I was just looking at a chart of QQQ (NASDAQ-100) and =
noticed an=20
  odd<BR>pattern:<BR><BR>Over the last 3 weeks (Since Feb 18 - 16 =
trading days)=20
  the QQQ's have had 6<BR>days of increasing, above-average volume. On =
each of=20
  these 6 days, the index<BR>went up. On nine of the ten days of =
declining,=20
  below-average volume, the<BR>index went down.<BR><BR>Overall, the QQQ =
is down=20
  about 5% (from 25.25 to 24) over those 16 days.<BR><BR>Does anyone =
recognize=20
  this pattern and know if there are historical<BR>precedents for the =
likely=20
  direction from here? Dp all these volume days with<BR>no 'breakout' =
forward=20
  progress indicate=20
  distribution?<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR>Ian<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To=20
  subscribe/unsubscribe, email "<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
  email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
  not use quotes in your email.<BR><BR><BR><BR>-<BR>-To =
subscribe/unsubscribe,=20
  email "<A=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:majordomo@xmission.com">majordomo@xmission.com</A>"<BR>-In=
 the=20
  email body, write "subscribe canslim" or<BR>-"unsubscribe =
canslim".&nbsp; Do=20
  not use quotes in your email.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0087_01C2E7E3.A0E945F0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] M "Tom Worley"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] M "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M Marc Deiter
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] M "Tom Worley"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.