From: Ian <ianstm@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] "M"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 22:10:39 -0800
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Hi Tom: It sure looked like mostly short-covering from my vantage point. We were due for it. That being said, the Oct 10 - Dec 3 rally started out the same way - driven by temporary seller exhaustion and a ton of short covering. So theres nothing to say that this cannot last a while too. One thing that really stands out to me is that the SOXX actually bottomed way back on February 7 - and resisted any drop in the last 2 weeks. The SOXX is up 11 1/2% from yesterdays low, which is a staggering 9 hours of trading for a major index. IMO, this increases the chances that there are a few days/weeks of staying power in the NASDAQ just from the strength of the semis. Just remember, that if you look at a 3-year weekly chart of the OEX, and watch the 40-week EMA, you will find that it has been the ceiling for every rally. So if we do have a rally, I'd be looking to go short at OEX 460. We'll see. Cheers, Ian - ----- Original Message ----- From: Tom Worley <stkguru@bellsouth.net> To: CANSLIM <canslim@lists.xmission.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:24 PM Subject: [CANSLIM] "M" > OK, we got a good rally today, whether it was just a relief rally, or short > covering, or maybe even a real rally, with real sidelined cash flowing back > in. > > Mutual funds only have two weeks to invest any cash in excess of their > limits, and may have contributed. A delay in a vote at the UN is being > credited, so just may be news driven, here today, gone tomorrow. > > Nonetheless, we certainly got a 2+% gain on every index, and on volume well > exceeding daily average. And that comes in a period when daily volume has > been typically well under average. > > So, is anybody starting to count the days, looking for the follow thru day > 4-7 days out? Coincidentally, that period might also fall just after war > with Iraq is unilaterally initiated by the USA, which would cause at least > some minor relief rally. > > Does anyone trust today's gains? With so much news, can we trust technicals? > > Tom Worley > stkguru@bellsouth.net > AIM: TexWorley > > > > - > -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" > -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or > -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] "M" Mike
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]