From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 12:52:49 -0500
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Davellil5@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Davellil5@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_057C_01C31885.64E93D30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Several of us spent a lot of time trying to determine the importance of = 'I' and we came to the conclusion that WON needed a vowel to tie CANSLIM = together.=20 The study concluded: 1) a min/max 'number' was personal preference and varied by guru and/or = investing software and data suppliers 2) data sources (MSN, HGSI, AAII, DGO, AM*) varied greatly 3) what to count as an institution is still up for debate 4) asking Bill came up with: =20 Institutional sponsorship. You want at least a few of the better = performing mutual funds owning the stock. They're the ones who will = drive the stock up on a sustained basis They backed away from that because the better/best performing mutual = funds were mostly Bear Funds.... this was during the lengthy down market I like 'I' as a VOWEL.... less to look at and more meaningful. Gene - ------=_NextPart_000_057C_01C31885.64E93D30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">Several of us spent a lot of time = trying to=20 determine the importance of 'I' and we came to the conclusion that WON = needed a=20 vowel to tie CANSL<FONT color=3D#0000ff = size=3D4><STRONG>I</STRONG></FONT>M=20 together. </FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">The study concluded:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">1) a min/max 'number' was = personal=20 preference and varied by guru and/or investing software and data=20 suppliers</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">2) data sources (MSN, HGSI, AAII, DGO, = AM*)=20 varied greatly</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">3) what to count as an = institution is still=20 up for debate</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS">4) asking Bill came up = with: <FONT=20 size=3D2><STRONG> </STRONG></FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><FONT=20 size=3D2><STRONG></STRONG></FONT></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS"><FONT size=3D2><STRONG>Institutional=20 sponsorship.</STRONG> You want at least a few of the better performing = mutual=20 funds owning the stock. They're the ones who will drive the stock up on = a=20 sustained basis</FONT></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2>They backed away from = that because=20 the better/best performing mutual funds were mostly Bear Funds.... = this was=20 during the lengthy down market</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2>I like 'I' as a = VOWEL.... less to=20 look at and more meaningful.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2>Gene</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans MS" = size=3D2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_057C_01C31885.64E93D30-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Davellil5@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership Davellil5@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]