[CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership


From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:35:08 -0500

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Jim Fulling"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Several of us spent a lot of time trying to determine the importance of =
'I' and we came to the conclusion that WON needed a vowel to tie CANSLIM =
together.=20

The study concluded:
1) a min/max 'number' was personal preference and varied by guru and/or =
investing software and data suppliers
2) data sources (MSN, HGSI, AAII, DGO, AM*) varied greatly
3) what to count as an institution is still up for debate
4) asking Bill came up with: =20

Institutional sponsorship. You want at least a few of the better =
performing mutual funds owning the stock. They're the ones who will =
drive the stock up on a sustained basis

They backed away from that because the better/best performing mutual =
funds were mostly Bear Funds.... this was during the lengthy down market

I like 'I' as a VOWEL.... less to look at and more meaningful.

Gene

- ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff background=3D""><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans =
MS">Several of us=20
spent a lot of time trying to determine the importance of 'I' and we =
came to the=20
conclusion that WON needed a vowel to tie CANSLIM together. <BR><BR>The =
study=20
concluded:<BR>1) a min/max 'number' was personal preference and varied =
by guru=20
and/or investing software and data suppliers<BR>2) data sources (MSN, =
HGSI,=20
AAII, DGO, AM*) varied greatly<BR>3) what to count as an institution is =
still up=20
for debate<BR>4) asking Bill came up with:&nbsp; <BR><BR>Institutional=20
sponsorship. You want at least a few of the better performing mutual =
funds=20
owning the stock. They're the ones who will drive the stock up on a =
sustained=20
basis<BR><BR>They backed away from that because the better/best =
performing=20
mutual funds were mostly Bear Funds.... this was during the lengthy down =

market<BR><BR>I like 'I' as a VOWEL.... less to look at and more=20
meaningful.<BR><BR>Gene</FONT></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Jim Fulling"
Previous Article (by Author): [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.