From: "Gene Ricci" <genr@swbell.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 22:35:08 -0500
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] IART Roger Tawa
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Several of us spent a lot of time trying to determine the importance of = 'I' and we came to the conclusion that WON needed a vowel to tie CANSLIM = together.=20 The study concluded: 1) a min/max 'number' was personal preference and varied by guru and/or = investing software and data suppliers 2) data sources (MSN, HGSI, AAII, DGO, AM*) varied greatly 3) what to count as an institution is still up for debate 4) asking Bill came up with: =20 Institutional sponsorship. You want at least a few of the better = performing mutual funds owning the stock. They're the ones who will = drive the stock up on a sustained basis They backed away from that because the better/best performing mutual = funds were mostly Bear Funds.... this was during the lengthy down market I like 'I' as a VOWEL.... less to look at and more meaningful. Gene - ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff background=3D""><FONT face=3D"Comic Sans = MS">Several of us=20 spent a lot of time trying to determine the importance of 'I' and we = came to the=20 conclusion that WON needed a vowel to tie CANSLIM together. <BR><BR>The = study=20 concluded:<BR>1) a min/max 'number' was personal preference and varied = by guru=20 and/or investing software and data suppliers<BR>2) data sources (MSN, = HGSI,=20 AAII, DGO, AM*) varied greatly<BR>3) what to count as an institution is = still up=20 for debate<BR>4) asking Bill came up with: <BR><BR>Institutional=20 sponsorship. You want at least a few of the better performing mutual = funds=20 owning the stock. They're the ones who will drive the stock up on a = sustained=20 basis<BR><BR>They backed away from that because the better/best = performing=20 mutual funds were mostly Bear Funds.... this was during the lengthy down = market<BR><BR>I like 'I' as a VOWEL.... less to look at and more=20 meaningful.<BR><BR>Gene</FONT></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_07D8_01C318D6.BDAE98B0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] IART Roger Tawa
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership "Gene Ricci"
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Institutional Ownership AJAskey@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]