Re: [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer???

From: Chazmoore@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer???
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 23:35:17 EDT

Next Article (by Subject): RE: [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer??? "Katherine Malm"
Previous Article (by Subject): [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer??? Mhboatman@aol.com
Top of Thread: [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer??? Mhboatman@aol.com
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Upward sloping saucer??? "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

- --part1_129.2a804b15.2bfd9f75_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Howard: Sorry but I don't think WON recognizes a sloping saucer. A saucer 
is nothing more than a cup/handle with an extended flat bottom. The left hand 
side of the cup defines the beginning of a formation.
What you are looking at, I believe, is an ascending base. This is a very 
good, healthy formation with constant growth, but without the explosive jump 
we look for in the c/h. In today's market I personally like the ascending 
base.
Hope this helps.
Charley

- --part1_129.2a804b15.2bfd9f75_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=3D2>Hi Howard: Sorry but I do=
n't think WON recognizes a sloping saucer. A saucer is nothing more than a c=
up/handle with an extended flat bottom. The left hand side of the cup define=
s the beginning of a formation.
<BR>What you are looking at, I believe, is an ascending base. This is a very=
 good, healthy formation with constant growth, but without the explosive jum=
p we look for in the c/h. In today's market I personally like the ascending=20=
base.
<BR>Hope this helps.
<BR>Charley</FONT></HTML>

- --part1_129.2a804b15.2bfd9f75_boundary--

- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.