From: Tomas <tomas986@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Next Article (by Date): RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Yea, I am beginning to realize that IBD is not a very good mining tool. Katherine, a question. How do you save those charts to annotate? I cannot seem to save the whole charts. I can only save one chart at a time. I am referring to your cwhcharts. Oh, I recalled you saying that it is ok to save your charts and annotate them, right? Regards, tomas - --- Katherine Malm <kmalm@earthlink.net> wrote: > Hi Ann and all, > > I have to agree with Bill on this. By the time > something makes it to a list like > the WR or the IBD100, they've already *become* the > leaders. It makes a heck of a > lot more sense to catch them as they're *becoming* > leaders. That is, if RS>=85 > is considered a leader, then how the heck did they > get there? They rose from a > lower RSRank to get there in the first place. If > they were rising in RSRank, > then they were *rising in price.* While looking for > outperformance to the market > and to other stocks is a cornerstone of CANSLIM > investing, I've never agreed > that mining should only be done after the stock is > at RSRank 80 or 85. It's true > that leaders will pull back and offer new entry > points, so having a list of > leaders is helpful. But the problem is, if you want > to get the best part of the > move, you've got to be watching these guys as they > set up and start the lion's > share of the move. The IBD started publishing an > index of the WR stocks over > time, showing a mild percentage gain vs. a sink hole > return in the indexes > during the Bear, but I suspect that if one were to > instead publish an index of > stocks breaking out of sound bases starting at a > non-laggard RSRank>=70, then > the index would be substantially higher. > > Years ago, a friend of mine and I would meet every > Saturday for coffee and pour > over the IBD together. At the time, he kept asking > why the heck all the stocks > mentioned in the paper didn't offer up a good entry > point. Most of the time, the > lists of stocks, the minigraphs, etc. were already > too extended. That meant that > in order to use the IBD itself for mining, we had to > sift through the > lilliputian stock tables highlighting stocks from > RSRank 70 and up, highlight up > and coming Industries, add the stocks from "Where > the Big Money is Flowing" then > one by one look at all the charts. It was exhausting > and incredibly time > consuming. My conclusion after practically loosing > my eyesight (and my > Saturdays) was that while the IBD is an incredible > resource for current news, > information on companies, keeping tabs on the Market > and learning about CANSLIM, > it's a lousy mining tool. > > Once I'd figured that out, I set out to instead > devise a methodology that would > let me mine for stocks that met the minimum > requirements for a CANSLIM-quality > stock and were *just* beginning to outperform and > setup for a breakout. The goal > was to own a stock before it showed up in the IBD. > Just as Bill suggested, > seeing it in the IBD *after* I'd found it was the > ultimate test. Or, another way > of saying it was that I didn't want to see a single > stock mentioned in the IBD > that I didn't already know about. For the most part, > I think that implies that > at the very least, one needs some sort of technical > software to do this. Many > here use HGS/Quotes Plus (QP2), DGO, Vectorvest and > others to do this and each > has their own particular approach. But even with > these tools, it still requires > looking through a lot of charts every day to make > sure you're seeing the stocks > *as* they set up. As I'd rather be hiking the Grand > Canyon or having a margarita > by the pool, that time spent motivated me to develop > even better tools for > finding stocks setting up for a breakout, leading to > my partnership with Mike at > the cwhcharts.com site. That means that there is a > third alternative to sifting > through the IBD or through a lot of charts, and that > is to let a computer do all > that time consuming work for you. Our approach is to > let the computer find *all* > the non-laggard stocks currently setting up in cup > with handle bases, put them > on a watchlist, and then let us know automatically > if they are breaking out > above their pivots. Now *there's* an excuse to have > another dip in the pool! > > Katherine > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf > Of Ann Hollingworth > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:01 PM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come > > > Thanks, Bill, and Rolf, for the watch list ideas. > I may have to change the > source of my minings. > Ann > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com > [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf > Of Rolf Hertenstein > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:39 AM > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Subject: Re: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come > > > Hi Bill - Are you referring to IBD's Screen of the > Day? > > I think in a recent discussion of the market, IBD > mentioned that further > breakouts at this stage of this bull run (however > long it'll be) are more likely > to be 'second rate'. The real leaders have broken > out and already have good > gains. This won't stop me from looking of course. > > Rolf > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bill Triffet > To: canslim@lists.xmission.com > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:22 PM > Subject: Re: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come > > > I use WR as a confirmation that I bought right. > I like to see one of my buys > show up there AFTER I've bought it. I also find > those graphs tend to be "Monday > morning quarterbacking". I think it's IBD's way of > showing how you how a stock > already broke out - not time to buy. I also find > many of them have broken out of > upwards trending handles which is troubling to me. > > As far as the IBD100, I like to track #25-100 > for increasing strength and a > proper entry points. By design, most of the top will > be already extended. > > For list creation, I'd also do a quick scan of > the daily updated stocks > featured on the IBD site for possible setup/entry > points. > > Btw, the use of an offline charting tool such as > Quotes Plus is a real time > saver when you need to look at lots of stocks for > list building. The charts pop > up instantly allowing you to make quick end of day > scans. Doing it online - even > with a highspeed connection is much slower though > you see them intraday. > > -- > Bill > > > > > - ----------------------------------------------------------------- > I was just going through the charts of IBD100 > last night, and was thinking > the exact same thing. Are there any other lists > of high quality CANSLIM > stocks that should be scanned to check for > proper price patterns? > > Chris > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ann Hollingworth > To: CANSLIM Listserv > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:28 AM > Subject: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come > > > It seems to me, as I hunt through WR and > IBD100, that there are a lot of > overextended stocks, and not to many on the > right side of their cup or > ready to break out. > > It would seem to me that there could be two > reasons === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Top of Thread: RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Next in Thread: RE: Re: [CANSLIM] breakouts to come "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]