From: "John Solarno" <workvirt@workvirtual.com>
Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TSCO
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:13:17 -0400
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
Katherine: Has anybody told you recently that you are absolutely, totally AWESOME? I was just sorting through a passel of email and wondering how I was = going to respond to it all, and then I saw your message and thought, "Look at = this woman. Day after day after day, she takes time out of whatever she's = doing to write out cogent, detailed replies to people, most of whom are = complete strangers." =20 If someone printed out all of your emails over the years and stacked = them up, I'm sure the pages would exceed all of the Harry Potter books = combined!=20 There are obviously many people who contribute to this board, but I = thought I would take a moment and make sure that one of them (you!) was told = THANK YOU for being so consistently generous with your time and knowledge. John Solarno=20 - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:56 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TSCO Hi Harold, In the context of the discussion, a stock that is *already* rising from = a previous consolidation affords no low-risk entry point. With TSCO, an = entry here puts you at risk of sitting out another pullback to the previous logical area of support. In this case, that can be all the way back to = the previous pivot, slightly below (as that wide bar during the last = pullback just after the last BO suggests), or somewhere around the 50dMA. The = slight wedging action in recent weeks suggests that the probability of a = pullback is very high, and particularly if one uses an 8% stop loss, the = probability of being shaken out is therefore very high. If one really likes this stock, then it's a lot smarter to wait for a benign pullback and take your chances that it begins to move up again = from the pullback, as your odds of making money on the trade are considerably higher. This is precisely what Fred has done for a couple of years, purchasing on pullbacks and selling TSCO many times since 12/01. I think the lesson with something like TSCO is that the 8% stop loss is = a protective mechanism for entry at the ideal buy point (a strong BO on = volume from a base), as the pullback here tends not to be much deeper if the BO = is strong. However, using an 8% stop when entering an extended stock is = just and excuse to loose 8%. There are plenty of good stocks out there, but = one can purcase "a very good stock" and still lose their shirt 8% at a time. When a stock is extended, the 8% stop has no logic, because the next = logical area of support is generally much, much lower than 8% below the extended entry. Even if one were to set a stop well below the 8% and back at = logical support, then the risk is that the stock not only pulls back but *fails* outright, falling back into the base. At that point, a stop would force = you out at a much bigger loss than 8%. Oooh...makes me shiver to think about = it. Katherine - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Harold Josephson Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:09 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TSCO Hi Katherine, What do you conclude from this chart? Thanks Harold - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com] On Behalf Of Katherine Malm Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:07 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: RE: [CANSLIM] TSCO Hi Treb, Here's the chart as I see it: http://www.cwhcharts.com/katherine/TSCO061603.JPG Katherine - -----Original Message----- From: owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com [mailto:owner-canslim@lists.xmission.com]On Behalf Of Treb Courie Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:48 AM To: canslim@lists.xmission.com Subject: [CANSLIM] TSCO Is TSCO breaking out today? It's got good fundamentals and is on my = watch list. However, I think I'm going to stay off of it--it looks to me like = it broke out of a sloppy handle on 2 June and is too extended now. Regards, Treb - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email. - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Next in Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] TSCO Chazmoore@aol.com
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]