From: "Norman Boyd" <theboyd@tisd.net>
Subject: [CANSLIM] benign pull-backs revisited
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:31:40 -0500
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Opportunity Cost "Harold Josephson"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Opportunity Cost "Logan, Scott L."
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C33CF3.7F6598B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit As I watched this apparently "less than constructive" week go by, it struck me there was some resemblance to the pull-back discussion we had a few days ago. The vol on the S&P was below the 50dma each day this week. If the M were a single stock I would call this a "benign" pull-back. Certainly there was a little bad news this week, there always is; but there was also some very good news. That, combined with the spectacular quarter the S&P has had, makes me believe this is a constructive pull-back or retracement as some call it. I mining for some good stocks, looking forward to the rebound and trying to keep a positive approach. Norm - ------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C33CF3.7F6598B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4522.1800" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>As I watched this apparently "less than constructive" week go by, = it struck=20 me there was some resemblance to the pull-back discussion we had a few = days=20 ago. The vol on the S&P was below the 50dma each day this = week. =20 If the M were a single stock I would call this a "benign" = pull-back. =20 Certainly there was a little bad news this week, there always is; but = there was=20 also some very good news. That, combined with the spectacular = quarter the=20 S&P has had, makes me believe this is a constructive pull-back or=20 retracement as some call it. I mining for some good = stocks, looking=20 forward to the rebound and trying to keep a positive = approach.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Norm</DIV></BODY></HTML> - ------=_NextPart_000_00A4_01C33CF3.7F6598B0-- - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Opportunity Cost "Harold Josephson"
Previous Article (by Date): RE: [CANSLIM] Opportunity Cost "Logan, Scott L."
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]