[CANSLIM] Off topic apology

From: "Ann Hollingworth" <annholly@attbi.com>
Subject: [CANSLIM] Off topic apology
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:11:55 -0400
Next Article (by Date): [CANSLIM] You mijght want to check out CVU " Bob Hodes"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] benign pull-backs revisited "Ann Hollingworth"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C33E83.11756510
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry about sending personal to group again.
Ann

- ----- Original Message -----=20
From: Ann Hollingworth=20
To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] benign pull-backs revisited


Just got home from Maine.
Did you by any chance type in the WR?
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Norman Boyd=20
  To: canslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:31 PM
  Subject: [CANSLIM] benign pull-backs revisited


  As I watched this apparently "less than constructive" week go by, it =
struck me there was some resemblance to the pull-back discussion we had =
a few days ago.  The vol on the S&P was below the 50dma each day this =
week.  If the M were a single stock I would call this a "benign" =
pull-back.  Certainly there was a little bad news this week, there =
always is; but there was also some very good news.  That, combined with =
the spectacular quarter the S&P has had, makes me believe this is a =
constructive pull-back or retracement as some call it.  I mining for =
some good stocks, looking forward to the rebound and trying to keep a =
positive approach.

  Norm
- ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C33E83.11756510
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Sorry about sending =
personal to group=20
again.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Ann</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message -----=20
<DIV style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A=20
title=3Dannholly@attbi.com href=3D"mailto:annholly@attbi.com">Ann =
Hollingworth</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, June 29, 2003 9:10 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [CANSLIM] benign pull-backs =
revisited</DIV></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Just got home from=20
Maine.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Bookman Old Style" size=3D2>Did you by any chance =
type in the=20
WR?</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dtheboyd@tisd.net href=3D"mailto:theboyd@tisd.net">Norman =
Boyd</A>=20
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dcanslim@lists.xmission.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:canslim@lists.xmission.com">canslim@lists.xmission.com</A>=
 </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Friday, June 27, 2003 =
10:31=20
PM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [CANSLIM] benign =
pull-backs=20
  revisited</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>As I watched this apparently "less than constructive" week go by, =
it=20
  struck me there was some resemblance to the pull-back discussion we =
had a few=20
  days ago.&nbsp; The vol on the S&amp;P was below the 50dma each day =
this=20
  week.&nbsp; If the M were a single stock I would call this a "benign"=20
  pull-back.&nbsp; Certainly there was a little bad news this week, =
there always=20
  is; but there was also some very good news.&nbsp; That, combined with =
the=20
  spectacular quarter the S&amp;P has had, makes me believe this is a=20
  constructive pull-back or retracement as some call it.&nbsp; I mining =
for some=20
  good stocks,&nbsp;looking forward to the rebound and trying to keep=20
  a&nbsp;positive approach.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Norm</DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

- ------=_NextPart_000_0095_01C33E83.11756510--


- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.
Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.