From: Davellil5@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] LF
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 07:51:12 EDT
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] LF Davellil5@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] cwhcharts Bob Johnson
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] LF "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
My general impression is that, early in the present up-move of the market (April, May), the stocks that moved up along their right sidewalls were the more exciting New America stocks. Those are now post-breakout and losing some steam. Now the somewhat less exciting New America stocks, like LF, are climbing their right sidewalls and approaching breakouts or have had very recent breakouts. I suspect that this group of stocks will enjoy slower climbs than the first group. The logic may be that in an up-move, investors first chase the glamorous stocks, then fall back to the more pedestrian ones. Maybe when investors have finished exploiting the pedestrian New Americas, they'll begin chasing the household names, like MSFT, GE, IBM, etc., and that will signalm the temporary end of this up-blip. All of these New America stocks that have been getting chased have, in common, good CANSLIM numbers. Some don't have good histories, but are great turn-ups or turn-arounds. Some have good histories too. But most have good near-term EPS growth prospects. I think that the CANSLIM numbers separate the sheep from the goats most of the time, i.e., charts are the entry point, but due diligence is the safeguard. Just some general observations to add perspective. Dave - - - -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com" - -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or - -"unsubscribe canslim". Do not use quotes in your email.
Next Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] LF Davellil5@aol.com
Previous Article (by Author): Re: [CANSLIM] cwhcharts Bob Johnson
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] LF "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]