Re: [CANSLIM] Second Guessing Myself - SFCC

From: Hong Hsu <honghsu@bellatlantic.net>
Subject: Re: [CANSLIM] Second Guessing Myself - SFCC
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:22:45 -0400

Next Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Break outs or pullbacks "Mike Lucero"
Previous Article (by Date): Re: [CANSLIM] Second Guessing Myself - SFCC Hong Hsu
Top of Thread: Re: [CANSLIM] Second Guessing Myself - SFCC Hong Hsu
Next in Thread: RE: [CANSLIM] Second Guessing Myself - SFCC "Katherine Malm"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]

>
>
>(1) price/chart action (Technicals first, always, and most important)
>(2) fundamentals (preponderance of evidence on the specifics as well as
>news, significant developments and more details as necessary)
>(3) group/industry health (only as a risk assessment factor)
>
>  
>
 

Very interesting point. Katherine, Would you elaborate little bit here how to employ TA first and fundies second.  If fundies is not convincing while TA is "perfect", do you still take it?  An example of this is PWAV. The chart is good and volume is also good, but earnings are not.
 
- -Hong

 




- -
- -To subscribe/unsubscribe, email "majordomo@xmission.com"
- -In the email body, write "subscribe canslim" or
- -"unsubscribe canslim".  Do not use quotes in your email.

Go to Jeff Salisbury LWGate Home Page.